Skrapp-Email-Verifier-favicon

Skrapp Email Verifier

Free and accurate email verification for cleaner outreach lists

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

Skrapp Email Verifier Overview

  • Updated February 10, 2026

Skrapp Email Verifier is a reliable email checking tool designed to help sales, marketing, and recruiting teams reduce bounce rates and improve deliverability. It verifies single or bulk email addresses using advanced checks without sending test emails.

With up to 98% accuracy, built-in API access, and seamless integration with Skrapp’s lead generation tools, it supports scalable and efficient outreach workflows.

Key Features

  • Single & Bulk Email Verification: Verify individual emails or entire lists with up to 98% accuracy.
  • Advanced Verification Checks: Includes syntax validation, role-based detection, disposable email screening, and catch-all identification.
  • No Test Emails Sent: Uses secure server-level checks without contacting recipients.
  • Email Verification API: Integrate automated email checking into custom workflows and applications.
  • Credit Fair-Use Policy: Credits only deducted for valid or catch-all emails.

Price

Plan Price Featured
Free $0/mo (Billed Monthly) 100 Email Credits per month, Core Email Verifier & Finder, Chrome Extension
Professional (1K Credits) $30/mo (Billed Annually) / $39/mo (Billed Monthly) 1,000 Email Credits/month, Unlimited searches & exports, CRM sync
Enterprise (50K Credits) $262/mo (Billed Annually) / $349/mo (Billed Monthly) 50,000 Email Credits/month, API access, Dedicated account manager

Price details: https://skrapp.io/pricing

Pros

Competitor

Pros
Hunter.io Skrapp offers more generous free credits and simpler pricing, making it easier for small teams to start verifying emails without upfront cost. Its LinkedIn-focused workflow is more intuitive for B2B prospecting, while verification is included within finder credits, reducing overall spend.
ZeroBounce Compared to ZeroBounce, Skrapp is easier to use and better suited for sales teams rather than pure email marketers. It combines verification with lead generation tools, allowing users to find and verify emails in one platform instead of managing multiple tools.
Snov.io Skrapp provides a cleaner interface and more straightforward credit usage. Users often find Skrapp’s verification results easier to interpret, with fewer complex statuses, and appreciate that invalid or unknown emails do not consume credits.
Lusha While Lusha focuses on contact data enrichment, Skrapp delivers stronger standalone email verification accuracy and transparent pricing. Skrapp’s fair credit policy and rollover system give teams more control over usage and budgeting.
RocketReach Skrapp is more cost-effective for users who primarily need verified emails. Its verification accuracy and LinkedIn integrations are easier to set up, making it a better option for smaller sales teams and recruiters with limited technical resources.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
Hunter.io Hunter provides more detailed domain-level insights and confidence scores. Compared to Hunter, Skrapp’s email verifier offers fewer advanced reporting metrics, which may limit analysis for teams focused heavily on domain health and deliverability diagnostics.
ZeroBounce ZeroBounce specializes deeply in email verification and offers more granular validation signals. Skrapp’s verifier, while accurate, lacks some advanced indicators like inbox activity scoring, which high-volume email marketers may require.
Snov.io Snov.io includes built-in email outreach campaigns alongside verification. Skrapp does not offer native campaign sending, requiring users to export verified emails to third-party tools for outreach execution.
Lusha Lusha provides broader contact data such as phone numbers. Skrapp Email Verifier focuses primarily on email validation, which can feel limited for teams needing multi-channel contact enrichment.
RocketReach RocketReach maintains a larger global contact database. Skrapp’s strength is verification accuracy rather than raw data volume, which may be a drawback for enterprises prioritizing coverage over verification depth.

Verified Customer Reviews

  • G2 Review (Rating: 4.4/5): Users appreciate the ease of use and fast email verification but mention that advanced analytics and reporting options are limited.
  • Capterra Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Reviewers value the reliable verification accuracy and time savings, though some note that higher-volume plans can become costly.
  • Software Advice Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Customers like the simple workflow and integration with email finding, but report fewer customization options compared to specialized verifiers.
  • Trustpilot Review (Rating: 3.2/5): Users mention solid verification results and helpful support, while pointing out occasional credit consumption confusion.
  • Reddit/r/coldemail Review (Rating: 4/5): Community members praise the fair credit policy and bulk verification value, but note that catch-all results still require manual judgment.