Home » Business Management Tools » Toggl
Toggl Track is a versatile business management tool designed for time tracking, project management, and productivity analysis. It enables users to monitor time spent on tasks, manage projects, and generate detailed, customizable reports to optimize workflows.
With features like team collaboration, invoicing, and integrations with tools like Asana and Slack, Toggl helps businesses and freelancers enhance efficiency, streamline operations, and make data-driven decisions.
Check Pricing details: https://toggl.com/track/pricing/
Competitor |
Pros of Toggl Track |
|---|---|
| ClickUp | Toggl Track excels in simplicity and ease of use, offering one-click time tracking and a clean interface ideal for freelancers and small teams. Its 100+ integrations, including Asana and Slack, provide robust connectivity compared to ClickUp’s broader but more complex project management focus.
Toggl’s detailed, customizable reports offer deeper time-tracking insights than ClickUp’s time management features, which prioritize scheduling and AI-driven suggestions. |
| Hubstaff | Toggl Track’s user-friendly design and intuitive timer make it more accessible than Hubstaff, which focuses heavily on monitoring features like screenshots and GPS tracking.
Toggl’s free plan supports up to 5 users with unlimited projects, as you can see, it is more flexibility for small teams compared to Hubstaff’s paid plans. Its Pomodoro timer and offline tracking enhance productivity without the invasive monitoring Hubstaff emphasizes. |
| Harvest | Toggl Track’s free tier is more generous than Harvest’s, which limits free plans to one user. Toggl’s seamless cross-platform syncing and extensive integrations (e.g., FreshBooks, Basecamp) provide greater flexibility for diverse workflows.
Its reporting is more customizable, which offers detailed charts for productivity analysis, whereas Harvest focuses more on invoicing and payment integrations like PayPal and Stripe. |
| Time Doctor | Toggl Track offers a cleaner, less intrusive experience compared to Time Doctor’s focus on productivity monitoring with distraction alerts and app usage tracking.
Toggl’s customizable billable rates and project dashboards are more robust for client-based work, and its free plan is more accessible for small teams than Time Doctor’s paid-only advanced features. |
| Clockify | Toggl Track’s interface is more polished and user-friendly than Clockify’s, with a stronger emphasis on visual reporting and analytics. Toggl’s Pomodoro timer and idle detection provide unique productivity tools absent in Clockify.
While both offer free plans, Toggl’s supports more integrations and has a more intuitive setup for categorizing projects and clients. |
| Everhour | Toggl Track’s free plan and broader integration library (100+ apps) outshine Everhour’s more limited free tier and integration options.
Toggl’s one-click tracking and offline mode are more reliable for mobile users, and its reporting capabilities are more detailed for analyzing time allocation across projects, making it better suited for freelancers and small businesses. |
| Timely | Toggl Track’s manual and automatic tracking options are more flexible than Timely’s integration-heavy approach, which relies on syncing time from other tools.
Toggl’s project management dashboard and customizable tags offer better organization for complex workflows, and its free plan is more feature-rich for small teams compared to Timely’s paid-focused model. |
Competitor |
Cons of Toggl Track |
|---|---|
| ClickUp | Toggl Track lacks the comprehensive project management features of ClickUp, such as task dependencies, Gantt charts, and AI-driven scheduling. Its focus on time tracking means it’s less suited for teams needing robust planning tools or calendar-based time blocking, where ClickUp’s drag-and-drop interface excels.
Toggl’s reporting, while detailed, may not match ClickUp’s advanced project visualization capabilities. |
| Hubstaff | Toggl Track does not offer advanced monitoring features like GPS tracking, facial recognition, or screenshot capture, which Hubstaff provides for remote team oversight.
Its pricing ($9/user/month for Starter) is higher than Hubstaff’s for similar time-tracking features, making it less cost-effective for larger teams needing employee monitoring tools. |
| Harvest | Toggl Track’s invoicing capabilities are less developed than Harvest’s, which integrates directly with PayPal and Stripe for seamless client payments.
Toggl’s mobile app has reported bugs, and its lack of native payroll integrations limits its appeal for businesses needing end-to-end financial workflows compared to Harvest’s ecosystem. |
| Time Doctor | Toggl Track lacks Time Doctor’s productivity-focused features like distraction alerts and website/app monitoring, which are valuable for remote teams.
Its reporting, while customizable, doesn’t include activity-level tracking or screenshots, so it limits the use for detailed employee oversight compared to Time Doctor’s holistic approach. |
| Clockify | Toggl Track’s paid plans ($9/user/month) are pricier than Clockify’s ($3.99-$11.99/user/month), which offers similar features at a lower cost.
Clockify’s free plan supports unlimited users, while Toggl’s is capped at 5, therefore, it is not scalable for larger teams. Toggl’s advanced features, like invoicing, are also less robust than Clockify’s. |
| Everhour | Toggl Track’s project management features are less structured than Everhour’s, which offers better task organization and Asana integration for remote teams.
Toggl’s lack of two-factor authentication for all users and HIPAA compliance makes it less secure for certain industries compared to Everhour’s more robust security options. |
| Timely | Toggl Track’s reliance on manual input for some features can be less efficient than Timely’s automated time-syncing via integrations. It lacks Timely’s hands-off approach to tracking, which may appeal to users already using integrated tools.
Toggl’s project management dashboard is also less comprehensive for large-scale project tracking. |
