Semrush |
Google Trends lacks detailed keyword data, such as search volume and difficulty, which Semrush provides comprehensively. It does not offer backlink analysis or competitor tracking, and this limits its utility for advanced SEO strategies. The absence of integrations with tools like Google Analytics reduces its flexibility, and Semrush’s robust analytics suite better serves data-driven marketers. |
Ahrefs |
Google Trends provides only relative popularity scores, not absolute search volumes, which Ahrefs delivers accurately. Its lack of backlink and technical SEO tools restricts in-depth optimization, and Ahrefs excels in these areas. Limited historical data and fewer customizable reports make Google Trends less suitable for professionals, who benefit from Ahrefs’ detailed competitor insights. |
Similarweb |
Google Trends does not provide traffic source or user engagement data, which Similarweb includes for a holistic view. Its analytics are less actionable for non-search channels, and Similarweb’s broader digital insights are more versatile. The platform’s regional data lacks granularity beyond city-level, and Similarweb offers deeper market analysis for strategic planning. |
Moz Pro |
Google Trends misses advanced features like keyword difficulty or link-building tools, which Moz Pro offers for SEO optimization. Its data is limited to relative trends, not precise metrics, and this reduces its depth compared to Moz Pro’s analytics. The lack of learning resources or support restricts its use for beginners, who find Moz Pro’s guides valuable. |
Ubersuggest |
Google Trends does not provide specific search volume or competition metrics, which Ubersuggest includes even in its free tier. Its analytics are less actionable for SEO campaign planning, and Ubersuggest’s keyword suggestions offer more depth. The platform lacks integration with other marketing tools, which limits its scope compared to Ubersuggest’s affordable, feature-rich options. |