Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Decision Making Software » MeetingDecisions.com
Decisions is a meeting management platform built specifically for Microsoft Teams and Microsoft 365. It helps organizations plan, run, and follow up on meetings with structured agendas, real-time collaboration, automated minutes, and AI-powered recaps.
Designed with strong security and compliance, Decisions keeps all meeting data inside your Microsoft tenant while improving engagement, accountability, and productivity.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free (Up to 5 Users) | $0 (Free) | Core agenda builder, limited meeting tools, limited Decisions AI access |
| Business (5+ Users) | $14/user/mo (Billed Annually) | Full meeting management suite, 100 AI credits per user/month, meeting minutes and engagement score |
| Large Teams (50+ Users) | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Advanced security features, scalable AI solutions, dedicated account manager |
| Premium AI Add-on | $10/user/mo (Billed Annually) | Unlimited AI usage, AI meeting recaps and minutes, no credit restrictions |
Price details: https://www.meetingdecisions.com/pricing
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Fellow | Compared to Fellow, Decisions offers deeper native integration with Microsoft Teams and Office 365, reducing the need for external tools. Organizations already standardized on Microsoft benefit from smoother workflows, stronger security controls, and less context switching during meetings. |
| Hugo | Decisions excels over Hugo in enterprise governance and compliance, especially for regulated industries. Its SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications, plus in-tenant data storage, make it more suitable for large organizations concerned about privacy and data residency. |
| Microsoft Loop | While Loop focuses on flexible collaboration blocks, Decisions provides a complete end-to-end meeting lifecycle. It adds structured agendas, decision tracking, voting, and formal minutes, making it more effective for leadership, board, and government meetings. |
| Otter.ai | Unlike Otter.ai, which centers mainly on transcription, Decisions supports preparation, facilitation, and follow-up. Teams gain agendas, tasks, decisions, and engagement metrics rather than only post-meeting transcripts and summaries. |
| Asana | Compared to Asana, Decisions is purpose-built for meetings rather than general project management. It captures meeting context, decisions, and accountability more naturally, while still syncing tasks into Microsoft Planner for execution. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Fellow | Compared to Fellow, Decisions can feel more complex for small teams that do not use Microsoft 365 extensively. Organizations outside the Microsoft ecosystem may find onboarding heavier and less flexible. |
| Hugo | Hugo may be faster to adopt for lightweight note-taking, whereas Decisions emphasizes structure and governance. Some users report a learning curve when configuring agendas, permissions, and advanced meeting workflows. |
| Microsoft Loop | Loop is simpler and more flexible for ad-hoc collaboration. Decisions can feel rigid in comparison, especially for teams that prefer informal meetings without predefined agendas or formal decision tracking. |
| Otter.ai | Otter.ai provides stronger standalone transcription accuracy and cross-platform support. Decisions’ AI features are powerful but depend on Microsoft permissions and credits, which can limit spontaneous usage. |
| Asana | Asana offers broader project visibility and automation beyond meetings. Decisions focuses tightly on meetings, so teams may still need a separate system for complex project planning and reporting. |
