Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Plagiarism Checker Software » Smallseotools Plagiarism Checker
SmallSEOTools Plagiarism Checker is a web-based tool designed to detect duplicate content across online sources. It supports students, bloggers, teachers, and SEO professionals by scanning text for copied segments and providing similarity reports.
The platform offers a generous free version for quick checks and a paid Pro version with higher word limits, faster processing, and access to multiple SEO and content tools.
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | $9.80 billed monthly (~$0.33/day) | 1 month validity • 0 user seats • 30k words limit • 116 + 17 pages • WordPress plugin • API • Optional additional account manager |
| Yearly (Recommended) | $94.08 billed yearly (was $117.60) • $7.84/month | 1 year validity • 0 user seats • 30k words limit • 1,596 pages • WordPress plugin • API • Optional additional account manager • Save 20% |
| Enterprise & LMS | Custom pricing | API • Turnkey LMS integrations • Enterprise-grade security • Customer permissions • Dedicated customer success team • Dedicated support |
Price details: https://pro.smallseotools.com/pricing#plagiarism-checker
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Grammarly | Compared to Grammarly, SmallSEOTools offers a free plagiarism checker without mandatory sign-up, making it easier for quick checks. It is more accessible for casual users and students who need occasional scans, although Grammarly provides deeper writing assistance and tighter integrations. |
| Quetext | SmallSEOTools is more budget-friendly than Quetext, especially with its free tier and lower-cost plans. Users can run basic plagiarism checks instantly, whereas Quetext focuses more on premium accuracy and requires payment for meaningful usage. |
| Scribbr | Unlike Scribbr, which targets academic users with paid reports, SmallSEOTools supports a broader audience including bloggers and SEO professionals. Its free access and bundled SEO tools make it more versatile for non-academic content creators. |
| Prepostseo | SmallSEOTools offers a cleaner interface and faster checks compared to Prepostseo. While both provide free plagiarism detection, SmallSEOTools bundles more utilities under one subscription, reducing the need to switch between platforms. |
| Copyscape | Compared to Copyscape, SmallSEOTools is significantly cheaper and more accessible. Copyscape is focused on web content protection, while SmallSEOTools serves broader needs with free checks and multiple content optimization tools. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Grammarly | Compared to Grammarly, SmallSEOTools lacks advanced writing suggestions and deep plagiarism databases. Grammarly offers more precise academic and professional checks, while SmallSEOTools focuses on basic detection and may miss nuanced similarities. |
| Quetext | Quetext provides clearer similarity explanations and color-coded feedback. SmallSEOTools can feel more generic, with less transparency around its detection methodology and fewer controls for refining plagiarism sensitivity. |
| Scribbr | Scribbr uses academic-grade databases and citations, which SmallSEOTools does not fully match. For thesis-level or journal submissions, SmallSEOTools may be insufficient compared to Scribbr’s more rigorous checks. |
| Prepostseo | While similar in scope, Prepostseo sometimes offers more detailed percentage breakdowns. SmallSEOTools prioritizes speed over depth, which can limit insight for users needing fine-grained plagiarism analysis. |
| Copyscape | Copyscape excels at monitoring copied web content over time. SmallSEOTools lacks continuous monitoring and alerting features, making it less suitable for long-term content protection strategies. |
