Home » Business Management Tools » Avaza
Avaza is a cloud-based, all-in-one business management tool designed for small to medium-sized client-focused businesses. It streamlines project management, time and expense tracking, quoting, and invoicing.
With features like task collaboration, Kanban and Gantt views, and robust reporting, Avaza enhances team productivity and profitability. Accessible on any device, it integrates with over 500 apps, offering a user-friendly interface and excellent customer support.
Pricing details: https://www.avaza.com/pricing
Competitor |
Advantages of Avaza |
|---|---|
| Replicon | Avaza offers a more integrated, all-in-one solution compared to Replicon, which focuses primarily on time tracking and expense management. Avaza’s robust project management features, including Kanban, Gantt, and List views, provide greater flexibility for task organization and collaboration.
Its invoicing system is highly customizable, supporting multi-currency and automated billing from tracked time and expenses, which users find seamless for client-focused workflows. The free plan is generous, allowing unlimited collaborators and basic features, ideal for freelancers and small teams. Avaza’s mobile apps for iOS and Android enhance on-the-go productivity. |
| Accelo | Avaza stands out for its intuitive interface and affordability compared to Accelo, which some users find complex for smaller teams. Avaza’s end-to-end functionality, from quoting to invoicing, is streamlined in a single platform that reduce the need for multiple tools.
Its integration with over 500 apps, including QuickBooks and Zapier, allows for broad workflow customization. Users praise Avaza’s responsive customer support and competitive pricing, particularly the free plan, which supports small businesses with limited budgets. The one-click conversion of quotes to projects or invoices adds efficiency not always matched by Accelo. |
| ActiveCollab | Avaza provides a more comprehensive feature set than ActiveCollab, which focuses heavily on project management but lacks robust invoicing and expense tracking. Avaza’s automation of invoice generation and expense management simplifies financial processes, and therefore saves time for client-focused businesses.
Its team collaboration tools, including integrated chat and task comments, create a centralized communication hub, reducing reliance on external apps. Users appreciate Avaza’s scalability, with plans from free to enterprise-level, and its mobile accessibility ensures seamless use across devices, offering an edge for remote teams. |
| Krow | Compared to Krow, which is built on Salesforce and tailored for larger enterprises, Avaza is more accessible for small to medium-sized businesses due to its lower cost and simpler setup.
Avaza’s all-in-one platform combines project management, time tracking, and invoicing without requiring a Salesforce ecosystem, so it is easier to adopt. Its user-friendly interface requires minimal technical skill, and the free plan supports freelancers and startups. Avaza’s extensive integrations and multi-currency invoicing cater well to international teams, which Krow may not match for smaller operations. |
Competitor |
Disadvantages of Avaza |
|---|---|
| Replicon | Avaza’s time tracking functionality is considered basic compared to Replicon, which offers advanced features like GPS tracking and time kiosk options. Users note that Avaza lacks support for tracking breaks or overtime, which can be a limitation for businesses needing detailed time analytics.
Additionally, Avaza’s interface, while intuitive, can feel complex for new users due to its extensive configuration options, whereas Replicon provides a more straightforward time-focused experience. The learning curve for Avaza’s task management may deter teams seeking simplicity. |
| Accelo | Avaza’s search functionality and budget alert features are weaker compared to Accelo, which users praise for its robust ticketing system and client communication automation. Some users find Avaza’s interface navigation challenging, especially when searching for specific task comments, which can hinder efficiency for larger projects.
Accelo’s deeper integration with Salesforce and advanced reporting capabilities may better suit businesses needing detailed analytics, while Avaza’s reporting is less customizable for complex needs. |
| ActiveCollab | Avaza falls short in deep customization compared to ActiveCollab, which allows users to modify its code and architecture (using MySQL and PHP) for tailored solutions. Businesses with unique industry needs may find Avaza’s ready-to-use design limiting, as it prioritizes general functionality over bespoke adjustments.
Plus, some users report that Avaza’s offline functionality is lacking, whereas ActiveCollab offers more flexibility for offline project work, which can be critical for teams in low-connectivity environments. |
| Krow | Avaza’s customization options are less robust than Krow’s, which benefits from Salesforce’s extensive ecosystem for enterprise-level tailoring. For large teams requiring advanced resource planning or complex analytics, Avaza’s reporting and configuration capabilities may feel restrictive.
Krow’s native Salesforce integration provides a seamless experience for businesses already using that platform, while Avaza’s third-party integrations, though numerous, may require more setup effort. Also, Avaza’s pricing can become costly for larger teams needing extra user access. |
