Home » Business HR Tools » ChartHop
ChartHop is a modern HR platform designed to help organizations understand and manage their workforce more effectively. It brings together people data, organizational charts, and workforce planning tools in one place, allowing leaders and HR teams to make informed decisions.
By offering clear visibility into employee information, team structures, and diversity metrics, ChartHop supports strategic planning and helps foster transparency and alignment across the company.
| Pricing Item | Details |
|---|---|
| First module cost | US $8 per employee per month for the first module. |
| Additional modules cost | US $4 per employee per month for each extra module beyond the first. |
| Entry-level “Basic” module | US $2 per employee per month for “ChartHop Basic”. |
| Minimum contract size | Minimum annual contract value of US $9,000 per year. |
| Implementation fees | One-time implementation fees are scoped separately (not publicly specified) |
| Starting price range (per employee) | Estimated between US $8–20 per employee per month, based on reviews. |
| Competitor | Pros of ChartHop |
|---|---|
| Lattice | ChartHop integrates workforce planning and org data visualization at a deeper level, which gives leaders a more strategic view than Lattice’s performance-oriented platform. |
| HiBob | ChartHop provides AI-powered insights and advanced analytics that go beyond HiBob’s strengths in culture and engagement, making it more suitable for data-driven decision-making. |
| BambooHR | ChartHop offers scenario planning, compensation modeling, and predictive insights, which expand far past BambooHR’s core HRIS and employee record functions. |
| Sift | ChartHop connects org chart visibility with compensation, headcount, and engagement planning, while Sift largely focuses on employee directory and chart exploration. |
| Leapsome | ChartHop adds broader organizational data visualization and planning, which gives it an edge over Leapsome’s narrower emphasis on performance and learning. |
| Competitor | Cons of ChartHop |
|---|---|
| Lattice | ChartHop often costs more and takes longer to show ROI, while Lattice is quicker to deploy and more focused on employee performance workflows. |
| HiBob | ChartHop’s breadth can feel complex and less intuitive for daily HR tasks, whereas HiBob delivers faster adoption and stronger cultural engagement tools. |
| BambooHR | ChartHop may overwhelm smaller teams with its depth and pricing, while BambooHR is leaner, more affordable, and easier for straightforward HR operations. |
| Sift | ChartHop requires higher investment and time to configure, while Sift is simple, cost-effective, and better suited for companies only needing org chart visibility. |
| Leapsome | ChartHop’s advanced planning may be excessive for companies focused on performance management alone, while Leapsome is more affordable and lighter to implement. |
