FreeConferenceCall Screen Share App Software provides free, reliable screen sharing combined with HD audio and video conferencing. Designed for businesses, educators, and remote teams, it enables unlimited meetings, recordings, and collaboration tools without participant downloads. With support for up to 1,000 attendees and global dial-in numbers, it offers a scalable, cost-effective solution for online meetings and presentations.
- Overview
- Features
- Pricing
- Pros
- Cons
- Reviews
Freeconferencecall Screen Share App Software Overview
- Updated February 28, 2026
Key Features
- Unlimited Screen Sharing: Share full desktops, applications, or specific windows without usage limits.
- HD Audio and Video: High-definition audio with optional video conferencing for clearer communication.
- No Participant Downloads: Attendees can join meetings without installing software.
- Meeting Recording: Record screen sharing sessions with multiple presenters for later playback.
- Remote Screen Control: Allow participants to control another user’s screen for collaboration or support.
- Global Dial-In Numbers: Access local dial-in numbers across 70+ countries.
Price
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/mo (Billed Monthly) | Up to 1,000 participants, Unlimited screen sharing, HD audio conferencing |
| One Number | $39/year (Billed Annually) | Single dedicated dial-in number, All Free features included, Simplified meeting access |
| Pro Bundle | $79/mo (Billed Monthly) | All One Number Feature, Custom Meeting Greeting, Custom Hold Music, Cloud Storage, 10GB |
Price details: https://www.freeconferencecall.com/pricing
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Zoom | Compared to Zoom, FreeConferenceCall offers core screen sharing and large participant limits at no cost, making it more budget-friendly for small organizations. It is simpler to set up and avoids time limits on free meetings, though Zoom provides more advanced video features. |
| Microsoft Teams | FreeConferenceCall is easier to use than Microsoft Teams, requiring less configuration and no ecosystem lock-in. It suits quick meetings and external collaboration better, while Teams excels in deep Office integration and persistent team workspaces. |
| Google Meet | Unlike Google Meet, FreeConferenceCall allows up to 1,000 participants for free and does not require Google accounts. It is more flexible for large calls, though Meet benefits from smoother browser-based video performance. |
| Webex | FreeConferenceCall undercuts Webex significantly on price, delivering screen sharing and recordings without enterprise fees. It is less complex and faster to deploy, though Webex provides stronger enterprise security and compliance options. |
| GoTo Meeting | Compared to GoTo Meeting, FreeConferenceCall is far more cost-effective and easier for occasional users. It covers essential screen sharing needs well, while GoTo Meeting offers more advanced administrative and analytics features. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Zoom | Against Zoom, FreeConferenceCall has fewer advanced video layouts and webinar-style controls. Users may find the interface less polished for large virtual events, even though it avoids Zoom’s free-plan time restrictions. |
| Microsoft Teams | Compared to Teams, FreeConferenceCall lacks deep integrations with productivity suites and persistent chat channels. Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 may find it less efficient for ongoing collaboration. |
| Google Meet | FreeConferenceCall does not match Google Meet’s seamless browser performance and AI-based noise cancellation. Users relying on Google Workspace integrations may experience more manual workflows. |
| Webex | Relative to Webex, FreeConferenceCall offers fewer enterprise-grade security certifications and administrative controls. Large regulated organizations may prefer Webex despite its higher cost. |
| GoTo Meeting | Compared with GoTo Meeting, FreeConferenceCall has more limited reporting and management tools. Businesses needing detailed usage analytics or structured IT controls may find it less suitable. |
Verified Customer Reviews
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.4/5): Freeconferencecall Screen Share App Software delivers reliable screen sharing and “easy recordings,” and users highlight that they can make calls without the complexity associated with other platforms.
- Software Advice Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Many describe it as one of the best free conferencing options available, pointing to screen sharing that feels “very useful and easy to deploy” with control over what gets shared.
- Trustpilot Review (Rating: 4/5): Freeconferencecall Screen Share App Software earns praise for very clear calls and smooth first-time experiences, with one group noting “5 of us on the conference call” had no problems at all. Some struggled to find a Zoom-like “pin screen” feature and one reviewer reported callers could not join because the conference appeared locked, yet others call it the “best unlimited free option” and applaud its transparency and support.
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.5/5): One reviewer loves the “overall experience” and sees strong potential for business meetings and conferences, noting the available features support professional use.
- TechRadar Review (Rating: 3.5/5): The Free package includes core conference calling tools such as web meetings, screen sharing, and file sharing, which gives teams access to essential collaboration features without paying upfront.
- apple.com Review: A long-term user reported that after an automatic update the app stopped opening on an iPhone 5s, while it continued to work on an iPhone 6s, and asked whether the latest version no longer supports older devices.