Looker |
Metabase lacks Looker’s advanced semantic modeling and LookML, and this limits its ability to handle complex data workflows for large enterprises. Its embedding capabilities are basic, with static iframes and watermarks, whereas Looker offers secure, white-labeled embedding.
Customer reviews note Metabase’s slower performance with large datasets, and its open-source version lacks Looker’s robust support and governance features, which are critical for enterprise-scale deployments. |
Tableau |
Metabase’s visualization options are less advanced than Tableau’s, and this restricts customization for complex dashboards. It lacks Tableau’s deep drill-down and interactive filtering capabilities, which are preferred by data analysts.
Reviews highlight Metabase’s stability issues, such as occasional graph crashes, and its limited data governance compared to Tableau’s robust security and compliance features, which make it less suitable for large organizations with complex needs. |
Microsoft Power BI |
Metabase does not match Power BI’s extensive library of over 500 connectors, and this limits its integration with diverse data sources. Its visualization capabilities are less robust, and reviews note slower load times with complex datasets compared to Power BI’s performance.
Metabase’s open-source version lacks Power BI’s advanced security features like end-to-end encryption, and its customer support is limited to community forums, unlike Power BI’s comprehensive resources. |
Amazon QuickSight |
Metabase’s data source integrations are fewer than QuickSight’s, and this restricts its use for organizations with diverse cloud-based systems. Its visualization options are less sophisticated, and reviews mention occasional performance lags, unlike QuickSight’s optimized cloud performance.
Metabase’s open-source support is limited to forums, whereas QuickSight offers AWS-backed support, and this makes it less reliable for mission-critical applications requiring rapid assistance. |
Domo |
Metabase lacks Domo’s extensive 1,000+ connectors and AI-powered insights, and this limits its appeal for organizations needing broad integrations. Its visualization options are less varied than Domo’s 150+ chart types, and reviews note performance issues during team collaboration.
Metabase’s governance features are minimal compared to Domo’s GDPR and HIPAA compliance, and its open-source plan lacks the dedicated support Domo provides for enterprise users. |
Apache Superset |
Metabase’s customization options for visualizations are less extensive than Superset’s, and this can limit flexibility for technical teams. Its performance can be slower with large datasets, as noted in reviews, whereas Superset handles SQL-based dashboards efficiently.
Metabase lacks Superset’s advanced RBAC and OAuth support, and its open-source version relies on community forums, which may not match Superset’s developer-focused community for technical troubleshooting. |
Holistics |
Metabase does not offer Holistics’ semantic modeling or dbt integration, and this restricts its use for teams needing reusable metrics. Its embedding capabilities are less advanced, with limited control compared to Holistics’ secure options.
Reviews note Metabase’s slower query performance and lack of version control, and its governance features are weaker than Holistics’ support for cross-database joins and ELT capacities, which are critical for data-driven organizations. |