Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Plagiarism Checker Software » Plagiarismchecker.ai
Plagiarismchecker.ai is an AI-powered plagiarism detection platform designed for students, writers, educators, and professionals. It scans text against extensive online databases to identify exact and partial matches, AI-generated content, and patchwriting.
The tool supports over 25 languages, multiple document formats, and provides detailed originality reports while prioritizing data privacy and secure processing.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Silver (Weekly) | $15/week | 10,000 words, Deep plagiarism check, No ads |
| Gold (Weekly) | $45/week | 50,000 words, API access, Deep plagiarism check |
| Silver (Monthly) | $20/mo (Billed Monthly) | 61,000 words, Deep plagiarism check, Plagiarism reports |
| Gold (Monthly) | $25/mo (Billed Monthly) | 100,000 words, API access, Multiple languages |
| Platinum (Monthly) | $40/mo (Billed Monthly) | 162,000 words, Bulk scanning, Advanced reports |
| Silver (Yearly) | $100/year | 350,000 words, Deep plagiarism check, No ads |
| Gold (Yearly) | $300/year | 1,200,000 words, API access, Advanced detection |
| Platinum (Yearly) | $480/year | 1,945,000 words, Bulk processing, Priority features |
Price details: https://plagiarismchecker.ai/pricing-plan/
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Turnitin | Plagiarismchecker.ai is more affordable and accessible to individuals, whereas Turnitin is institution-focused. It offers easier onboarding, faster checks for casual users, and does not require academic licenses, making it more practical for freelancers and independent students. |
| Grammarly Plagiarism Checker | Compared to Grammarly, Plagiarismchecker.ai provides higher word limits at lower prices and focuses more deeply on plagiarism detection rather than general writing assistance, making it more cost-effective for heavy plagiarism scanning needs. |
| Quetext | Plagiarismchecker.ai offers more flexible weekly and monthly plans and broader language support, which benefits international users who need frequent checks without committing to higher-priced subscriptions. |
| Scribbr | While Scribbr is highly accurate, Plagiarismchecker.ai stands out with faster turnaround times, bulk content handling, and lower entry pricing, making it more suitable for ongoing content production. |
| Copyscape | Unlike Copyscape’s per-search pricing, Plagiarismchecker.ai provides subscription-based plans with generous word counts, which is more economical for users performing frequent or large-scale plagiarism checks. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Turnitin | Compared to Turnitin, Plagiarismchecker.ai lacks formal academic database integration and institutional reporting standards, which may reduce trust for official university-level plagiarism verification. |
| Grammarly Plagiarism Checker | Grammarly offers a more polished user experience and integrated writing feedback, whereas Plagiarismchecker.ai focuses narrowly on detection and may feel less refined for all-in-one writing workflows. |
| Quetext | Quetext provides clearer citation assistance and source linking, while Plagiarismchecker.ai reports may require additional manual review to interpret sources effectively. |
| Scribbr | Scribbr generally detects a higher percentage of plagiarism in academic texts, whereas Plagiarismchecker.ai may occasionally miss obscure scholarly sources. |
| Copyscape | Copyscape is highly specialized for web content duplication, while Plagiarismchecker.ai may produce broader similarity matches that require manual filtering for SEO-specific use cases. |
