Home » Call Center Software » Call Tracking Software » Retreaver Call Tracking For Inbound Calls
Retreaver is a powerful inbound call tracking and routing platform designed for marketers, agencies, publishers, and performance networks. It enables precise attribution, real-time call routing, and monetization through features like RTB, number pooling, and webhook integrations.
With usage-based pricing and enterprise-grade flexibility, Retreaver scales easily for high-volume call operations.
Retreaver doesn’t list detailed tier pricing on its official site, you need to contact sales for exact quotes.
Here are estimated prices:
| Plan / Pricing Element | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Plan | ~$25/month | Reported entry price on several software listing sites — includes basic call tracking and routing. |
| Usage-based pricing | $0.05/minute + $1/number | G2 lists per-minute pricing for calls and a small monthly number rental fee. |
| Custom / Enterprise | Custom quote | Larger call volume and advanced features typically require contacting sales for a tailored plan. |
| Free Trial / Demo | Yes | Offered so you can test setups without upfront commitment. |
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| CallRail | Compared to CallRail, Retreaver offers significantly deeper call routing logic and real-time bidding capabilities, making it more suitable for performance marketing and pay-per-call models. Its usage-based pricing can also be more cost-effective for high-volume operations that outgrow flat monthly plans. |
| CallTrackingMetrics | Retreaver excels over CallTrackingMetrics in flexibility and customization. Advanced users benefit from granular routing rules, webhooks, and RTB features that are harder to replicate in more UI-driven platforms, making Retreaver ideal for technically sophisticated teams. |
| Invoca | Invoca is enterprise-focused and expensive, while Retreaver delivers many advanced capabilities at a lower entry cost. Retreaver’s transparent usage-based pricing and faster onboarding make it more accessible for agencies and mid-sized performance marketers. |
| Marchex | Compared to Marchex, Retreaver provides more hands-on control over call routing and monetization. Performance networks and affiliates prefer Retreaver for its real-time buyer logic and adaptability rather than relying on rigid, managed-service models. |
| Ringba | While Ringba is strong in affiliate call tracking, Retreaver stands out with superior support, customization, and reliability. Retreaver’s platform is often favored by teams needing bespoke workflows and deeper CRM or system integrations. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| CallRail | CallRail is generally easier for beginners, whereas Retreaver has a steeper learning curve. Users without technical or performance marketing experience may find Retreaver’s flexibility overwhelming compared to CallRail’s more guided, simplified workflows. |
| CallTrackingMetrics | CallTrackingMetrics provides more built-in dashboards and reporting templates. Retreaver may require additional configuration or external tools to achieve similar out-of-the-box reporting depth for non-technical users. |
| Invoca | Invoca offers advanced AI-driven conversation analytics and speech insights that Retreaver does not emphasize. Enterprises focused heavily on conversation intelligence may find Retreaver less robust in AI-driven analysis. |
| Marchex | Marchex provides more managed services and analytics for large brands. Retreaver is more self-service, which may require additional internal resources for setup, optimization, and ongoing management. |
| Ringba | Ringba can be quicker to deploy for affiliate marketers. Retreaver’s customization and onboarding process, while powerful, may take longer before teams are fully operational. |
