SEOGets

Enhance Google Search Console analytics, offering insights, multi-site tracking, and keyword optimization.

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

SEOGets Overview

  • Updated September 13, 2025

SEOGets is a powerful, user-friendly SEO analytics tool that enhances Google Search Console data. Designed for agencies and consultants, it offers a centralized dashboard to manage multiple websites, track branded and non-branded keywords, monitor topic clusters, and analyze performance with features like striking distance reports and content decay heatmaps.

With data privacy, affordable plans, and up to 50,000 rows of exportable data, SEOGets simplifies SEO optimization and drives actionable insights.

Key Features

  • Unified Master Dashboard: A single interface that consolidates all Google Search Console properties. Clicks and impressions for every site appear on one page, removing the need to switch accounts.

  • Access to 50,000 Rows of Data: Expansion of GSC’s 1,000-row cap into 50,000 rows. Broader visibility supports detailed analysis and stronger SEO decision-making.

  • Content Groups: Related pages such as blog posts or landing pages can be grouped for collective performance analysis. Patterns become easier to track, guiding optimization.

  • Topic Cluster Tracking: Real data monitors keyword performance across clicks, pages, and queries. Insights help measure SEO strategy effectiveness and adjust quickly.

  • Branded vs. Non-Branded Keyword Filtering: One-click filtering distinguishes branded queries from non-branded. Clear separation highlights brand awareness compared to organic growth.

  • Striking Distance Reports: Keywords close to first-page ranking are flagged. Priority content updates for these queries boost visibility and traffic.

  • Content Decay Heatmap: Color-coded visuals show performance changes over time. Pages in decline become easy to spot and update.

  • Multi-Query & Multi-Page Conditional Filtering: Point-and-click filtering across multiple queries and pages without regex. Granular control isolates key insights faster.

  • Cannibalization Reports: Detection of keyword overlap across multiple pages. Consolidation opportunities strengthen site authority.

  • PAA & Long Tail Keyword Filtering: Discovery of low-competition, high-intent queries. Insights uncover gaps that attract qualified traffic.

  • Weekly and Monthly Views: Trend reporting beyond daily data. Seasonal and long-term patterns become clearer for strategic planning.

  • Combined Portfolio Metrics: Aggregated data across multiple websites. A unified view supports client or stakeholder reporting.

  • SEO Testing: Hypotheses, success metrics, and results tracked for experiments like title or content changes. A structured process refines strategies.

  • Annotations & Core Updates: Google updates and custom notes overlay performance graphs. Context explains ranking shifts and informs action.

  • Privacy Blur: A secure way to hide URLs in screenshots or videos. Sensitive details remain protected when sharing analytics.

  • Shareable Magic Links: Secure, real-time links for sharing analytics with stakeholders. Collaboration stays aligned without account logins.

  • CTR Benchmark Report: Comparison of site click-through rates against industry averages. Underperforming areas guide title and description improvements.

  • Extended Historical Data (Optional Add-On): Storage of up to five years of data instead of GSC’s 16-month limit. Extended history supports deeper trend analysis.

  • Query Counting: Tracking of keyword visibility beyond the 1,000-row limit. Broader coverage shows algorithm impacts and performance growth.

  • Mobile App Experience: A mobile-friendly version of GSC set up in under a minute without downloads. Performance tracking stays accessible on the go.

Price

  • Free Plan: 50x more data than GSC, master dashboard, unlimited GSC accounts, flexible filtering, branded vs. non-branded tracking. Best for freelancers.
  • Unlimited Plan ($49/month): All Free Plan features, content groups, topic clusters, unlimited user invites, SEO testing, built-in reports, magic shared links. Best for small, medium, and large teams.

Check pricing details: https://seogets.com/pricing

Pros

Competitor Pros of Google Analytics
Amplitude Google Analytics offers a free tier with robust features like real-time reporting and audience segmentation, which Amplitude’s free plan limits. Its seamless integration with Google Ads and Search Console creates a unified ecosystem for marketers, unlike Amplitude’s focus on product analytics. Customer reviews praise GA’s accessibility (4.5/5 on G2), and its customizable dashboards suit diverse needs without advanced technical skills.
Heap Google Analytics provides comprehensive web analytics at no cost, whereas Heap’s pricing is undisclosed and often higher. GA’s extensive documentation and community support make it more approachable for beginners than Heap’s complex data models. Reviews highlight GA’s reliability for basic metrics (87% user satisfaction), and its cross-platform tracking in GA4 offers a broader view than Heap’s event-focused approach.
Hotjar Google Analytics excels in quantitative data with detailed traffic and conversion metrics, while Hotjar focuses on qualitative insights like heatmaps. GA’s free version includes advanced features like funnel analysis, which Hotjar’s $39/month plan only partially matches. Users appreciate GA’s scalability for large datasets, and its privacy controls align with GDPR, offering a cost-effective solution.
Kissmetrics Google Analytics is free and widely accessible, unlike Kissmetrics, which requires custom pricing. GA’s broad feature set, including real-time data and e-commerce tracking, rivals Kissmetrics’ customer journey focus without the high cost. Reviews note GA’s ease of setup (4.35/5 on FinancesOnline), and its Google tool integrations offer a streamlined experience for marketers.
Matomo Google Analytics offers a fully managed cloud solution, eliminating self-hosting needs, which Matomo often requires. GA’s free tier includes advanced segmentation and reporting, matching Matomo’s $21/month plan. Users value GA’s intuitive interface, and its real-time data processing outpaces Matomo’s occasionally delayed reporting, making it ideal for simplicity and speed.
Plausible Google Analytics provides a feature-rich free platform, while Plausible starts at $9/month for basic analytics. GA’s advanced capabilities, like predictive analytics and custom funnels, surpass Plausible’s simple metrics. Customer reviews commend GA’s depth (4.5/5 on G2), and its Google ecosystem integration offers robust marketing insights compared to Plausible’s lightweight approach.
Clicky Google Analytics delivers a free, comprehensive solution with features like audience demographics and goal tracking, while Clicky’s free plan is limited, and paid plans start at $9.99/month. GA’s global support community and extensive integrations outshine Clicky’s simpler setup. Reviews highlight GA’s scalability, and its GA4 model provides cross-device tracking, which Clicky cannot fully match.
Adobe Analytics Google Analytics offers a free version suitable for most businesses, while Adobe Analytics starts at $30,000/year. GA’s user-friendly interface requires less expertise than Adobe’s complex setup, and reviews praise its accessibility (87% satisfaction). GA’s real-time reporting and Google integrations provide a cost-effective alternative to Adobe’s advanced, costly analytics.

Cons

Competitor Cons of Google Analytics
Amplitude Google Analytics lacks Amplitude’s deep product analytics, which excels in cohort analysis and retention tracking. GA’s interface can be complex for beginners, unlike Amplitude’s streamlined dashboards. Reviews note GA’s data sampling at high volumes (3.4/5 on some platforms), and its reliance on Google’s servers raises privacy concerns compared to Amplitude’s flexible data handling.
Heap Google Analytics requires manual event setup, which Heap automates, potentially missing data if not configured properly. GA’s free version faces sampling issues for high-traffic sites, unlike Heap’s unsampled data. Users report GA’s learning curve as steep, and its web metrics focus lacks Heap’s retroactive analysis, which captures historical data without prior setup.
Hotjar Google Analytics provides limited qualitative insights compared to Hotjar’s heatmaps and session recordings. GA’s interface can overwhelm non-technical users, while Hotjar’s simplicity appeals to smaller teams. Reviews mention GA’s lack of visual behavior tools (2.5/5 for user experience features), and its cookie-based tracking raises privacy concerns, unlike Hotjar’s user-focused approach.
Kissmetrics Google Analytics falls short in tracking individual customer journeys across sessions, where Kissmetrics excels. GA’s generic reporting can feel less actionable for e-commerce than Kissmetrics’ revenue attribution. Users note GA’s complexity (3.4/5 in some reviews), and its free version lacks Kissmetrics’ detailed customer lifetime value insights.
Matomo Google Analytics stores data on Google’s servers, unlike Matomo’s self-hosted option, which offers greater data ownership. GA’s sampling for high-traffic sites reduces accuracy, while Matomo tracks all interactions. Reviews highlight GA’s complex navigation, and its GDPR compliance requires manual setup, whereas Matomo’s cookie-less tracking simplifies privacy compliance.
Plausible Google Analytics collects more user data than Plausible’s cookie-less, privacy-first approach, raising GDPR concerns. GA’s complex interface contrasts with Plausible’s simple dashboard, and reviews note its overwhelming features for small teams (3.4/5 in usability). GA lacks Plausible’s lightweight script, which ensures faster page loads and easier privacy compliance.
Clicky Google Analytics lacks Clicky’s real-time session tracking depth, which offers detailed visitor-level insights. GA’s reliance on cookies can skew data with ad blockers, unlike Clicky’s bot detection. Users report GA’s interface as less intuitive (3.4/5 in some reviews), and its broad focus misses Clicky’s granular content performance tools.
Adobe Analytics Google Analytics lacks Adobe Analytics’ advanced cross-channel analytics, which integrates offline data. GA’s free version faces sampling issues, unlike Adobe’s unsampled data for enterprises. Reviews note GA’s limited customization (3.4/5 for advanced users), and its simpler feature set cannot match Adobe’s AI-powered insights for complex business needs.

Customers' Reviews From Reliable Websites

G2 Review
Product Hunt Review
Slashdot Review