Targetprocess-OKR-favicon

Targetprocess OKR

Enterprise OKR management integrated with agile portfolio planning

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

Targetprocess OKR Overview

  • Updated February 11, 2026

Targetprocess OKR is an enterprise-grade Objectives and Key Results solution embedded within the Targetprocess agile portfolio management platform. It helps organizations align strategic, portfolio, and team-level objectives while tracking measurable key results.

Designed for SAFe and large-scale agile environments, it connects OKRs to work items, KPIs, and progress metrics to improve transparency, alignment, and accountability across complex organizations.

Key Features

  • Hierarchical OKRs: Define ultimate, strategic, and tactical objectives across enterprise, portfolio, and team levels.
  • SAFe OKR Framework: Native support for SAFe portfolios, value streams, ARTs, and agile teams.
  • KPI-Linked Key Results: Connect key results directly to KPIs and measurements for automated progress tracking.
  • Work Item Alignment: Link epics, features, user stories, and bugs to objectives to show execution impact.
  • Weighted Key Results: Apply weightings to key results to calculate objective progress more accurately.
  • Time-Period Management: Track OKRs by year, quarter, month, or custom periods with inherited timelines.

Price

Plan Price Featured
Enterprise (Targetprocess Platform) Custom Quote (Contact Sales) Enterprise OKR hierarchies, SAFe OKR support, KPI-linked progress tracking

 

Pros

Competitor

Pros
Jira Align Compared to Jira Align, Targetprocess OKR offers deeper visual modeling and more flexible hierarchy customization. It allows enterprises to map OKRs directly to execution artifacts without rigid templates, making it easier for complex organizations to adapt SAFe and hybrid agile practices.
WorkBoard Targetprocess provides stronger integration between OKRs and delivery work than WorkBoard. Teams can trace objectives directly to epics, features, and bugs, reducing manual updates and giving leadership a clearer, real-time view of how execution supports strategic goals.
Betterworks Unlike Betterworks, which focuses heavily on HR-driven performance management, Targetprocess OKR is built for agile delivery organizations. It excels at connecting OKRs to product development and portfolio planning rather than employee review cycles.
Perdoo Targetprocess is better suited for large enterprises than Perdoo, offering advanced portfolio-level hierarchies, SAFe alignment, and integration with complex agile workflows that go beyond lightweight OKR tracking.
Profit.co Compared to Profit.co, Targetprocess OKR stands out in handling large-scale dependencies and enterprise agility. Its ability to connect OKRs with KPIs and delivery artifacts makes it more powerful for organizations managing multiple portfolios and teams.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
Jira Align Compared to Jira Align, Targetprocess OKR can feel less prescriptive, which may increase setup time. Organizations looking for opinionated, out-of-the-box SAFe guidance may need more configuration effort to reach the same level of standardization.
WorkBoard Targetprocess is more complex than WorkBoard, which can slow adoption for non-technical stakeholders. Executives seeking a lightweight OKR-only experience may find Targetprocess overwhelming without proper onboarding and training.
Betterworks Unlike Betterworks, Targetprocess lacks strong HR-centric features such as continuous performance conversations and employee engagement tools, making it less suitable for organizations prioritizing OKRs primarily for people management.
Perdoo Perdoo is simpler and faster to deploy, while Targetprocess requires more configuration and agile maturity. Smaller teams may find the enterprise focus excessive for basic OKR tracking needs.
Profit.co Profit.co offers clearer pricing and faster onboarding, whereas Targetprocess relies on custom enterprise quotes. This can make cost evaluation and initial decision-making slower for budget-conscious organizations.

Verified Customer Reviews

  • G2 Review (Rating: 4.3/5): Users appreciate the flexibility and customization for agile and OKR alignment, but often mention a steep learning curve and complexity during initial setup.
  • Gartner Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Reviewers value strong SAFe and enterprise agility support, while noting that OKR reporting and usability could be improved.
  • TrustRadius Review (Rating: 4.3/5): Customers like having strategy, OKRs, and execution in one system, but report performance issues and higher administrative overhead.
  • Product Owl Review (Rating: 2.5/5): The platform is praised for visual planning and agile depth, though reviewers criticize complexity and the time required to configure it properly.
  • Reddit/r/agile Review (Rating: 4/5): Practitioners say OKRs work well for alignment and focus, but warn that tools like Targetprocess require discipline and mature processes to avoid over-complication.