Tarro

Tarro

Streamline restaurant operations with AI-powered phone ordering, delivery, and SMS marketing solutions.

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

Tarro Overview

  • Updated August 13, 2025

Tarro is a restaurant management tool designed to streamline operations and boost revenue. It offers AI-powered phone ordering with 99.5% accuracy, answering calls in under 4 seconds, seamless delivery services saving customers 25-50% compared to third-party apps, and targeted SMS marketing to drive repeat business.

Tarro reduces labor costs, eliminates staffing headaches, and enhances customer satisfaction, so it can help restaurants save 5-10% on costs while increasing orders by 13% on average.

Key Features

  • AI-Powered Phone Ordering: Utilize AI and human agents to answer restaurant calls in under 4 seconds with 99.5% order accuracy, handling orders, inquiries, and complaints to reduce staff workload and missed calls.
  • Tarro Delivery Service: Offer cost-effective delivery with no hidden fees, thus saving customers 25-50% compared to third-party apps and reducing restaurant platform fees.
  • SMS Marketing Platform: Provide targeted SMS campaigns with strategy, copywriting, and deployment managed by Tarro. It uses customer data to drive repeat business and increase orders.
  • Unified Dashboard: Centralize management of phone orders, delivery, and marketing, which allows restaurant owners to track performance, adjust offerings, and streamline operations.
  • Pay-Per-Performance Pricing: Charges only for completed orders, ideal for restaurants of all sizes.
  • Scalable Operations: Adapt to fluctuating demand, handle multiple orders simultaneously to support restaurant growth without compromising service quality.
  • 24/7 Availability: Ensure round-the-clock service, answer calls and manage orders at any time.
  • Labor Cost Reduction: Reduce the need for front-desk staff, saving 5-10% on labor costs.
  • Operational Flexibility: Offer customizable workflows to fit unique restaurant needs.
  • Customer Support and Insights: Provide ongoing support, industry expertise, and data-driven insights to optimize operations and drive business growth.

Price

No Specific Plan Listed: Tarro offers customized pricing for phone ordering, delivery, and SMS marketing, tailored to restaurant size and needs. Contact Tarro for details. (Suitable for freelancers, small, mid-sized, and large teams based on customization).

Pros

Competitor

Pros of Tarro
Toast Tarro excels with AI-powered phone ordering, achieving 99.5% accuracy and answering calls in under 4 seconds, unlike Toast’s POS-focused system. Tarro’s delivery service saves customers 25-50% compared to third-party apps, while Toast relies on costly integrations. Tarro’s fully managed SMS marketing contrasts with Toast’s self-managed tools.

Tarro’s pay-per-performance pricing is more flexible than Toast’s $0-$165/month plans, aligning costs with revenue. Reviews highlight Tarro’s 5-20% revenue increase, while Toast users note ease of use but criticize customer service.
Owner.com Tarro’s AI-driven phone ordering and delivery solutions outshine Owner.com’s focus on digital storefronts. With 99.5% order accuracy and bilingual support, Tarro handles calls directly, unlike Owner.com’s limited phone capabilities.

Tarro’s managed SMS marketing drives repeat business, surpassing Owner.com’s self-managed tools. Tarro’s usage-based pricing avoids upfront costs, unlike Owner.com’s less transparent subscriptions. Tarro’s reported 40% sales boosts contrast with Owner.com’s lack of specific revenue impact data.
Square Point of Sale Tarro outperforms Square in phone order management with AI-driven 24/7 call handling, unlike Square’s POS focus for in-person/online transactions. Tarro’s delivery saves 25-50% on fees, compared to Square’s third-party integrations. Tarro’s SMS marketing is more robust than Square’s basic tools.

Tarro’s pay-per-use pricing is more flexible than Square’s $0-$60/month plans. Tarro’s 5-10% labor cost savings outshine Square’s simplicity-focused reviews.
Olo Tarro’s integrated phone ordering and delivery save $810/month in labor and $10/order for customers, unlike Olo’s digital ordering focus. Tarro’s managed SMS marketing is more hands-off than Olo’s self-service tools.

Tarro’s usage-based pricing is potentially more affordable than Olo’s $389K ACV model. Tarro’s 40% sales increase and operational ease contrast with Olo’s efficiency-focused reviews lacking phone service praise.

Cons

Competitor

Cons of Tarro
Toast Tarro lacks Toast’s comprehensive POS and inventory management, limiting its appeal for restaurants needing robust transaction and stock tracking. Toast’s cloud-based platform offers superior reporting, unlike Tarro’s simpler dashboard. Tarro’s pricing opacity, requiring direct contact, contrasts with Toast’s clear $0-$165/month plans.

Toast’s customer service issues are noted, but Tarro’s sparse public reviews make reliability harder to assess. Toast’s broader integrations also overshadow Tarro’s focused phone, delivery, and marketing features.
Owner.com Tarro doesn’t offer Owner.com’s robust online ordering or branded website builder, limiting its digital-first appeal. Owner.com’s all-in-one platform with CRM integration surpasses Tarro’s narrower phone and delivery focus. Tarro’s SMS marketing, while managed, lacks Owner.com’s digital customization.

Tarro’s unclear pricing contrasts with Owner.com’s structured (though undisclosed) subscriptions. Tarro’s limited reviews versus Owner.com’s digital-focused feedback highlight its narrower scope.
Square Point of Sale Tarro’s lack of a full POS system makes it less versatile than Square, which handles in-person, online, and phone transactions seamlessly. Square’s inventory and feedback tools outpace Tarro’s dashboard. Tarro’s pricing lacks transparency compared to Square’s $0-$60/month plans.

Square’s ease-of-use reviews contrast with Tarro’s limited review data, potentially making Square a safer choice for broad needs.
Olo Tarro’s focus on phone ordering and delivery lacks Olo’s extensive online ordering and third-party delivery aggregation, better suiting digital-heavy restaurants. Olo’s multi-location scalability and integrations surpass Tarro’s simpler platform.

Tarro’s pricing opacity contrasts with Olo’s reported $389K ACV. Olo’s 700-customer base and 55% gross margin suggest stronger validation than Tarro’s limited reviews, posing a trust gap.

Customers' Reviews From Reliable Websites

Glassdoor Review
AmbitionBox Review
RepVue Review