ClickUp |
Toggl Track lacks the comprehensive project management features of ClickUp, such as task dependencies, Gantt charts, and AI-driven scheduling. Its focus on time tracking means it’s less suited for teams needing robust planning tools or calendar-based time blocking, where ClickUp’s drag-and-drop interface excels.
Toggl’s reporting, while detailed, may not match ClickUp’s advanced project visualization capabilities. |
Hubstaff |
Toggl Track does not offer advanced monitoring features like GPS tracking, facial recognition, or screenshot capture, which Hubstaff provides for remote team oversight.
Its pricing ($9/user/month for Starter) is higher than Hubstaff’s for similar time-tracking features, making it less cost-effective for larger teams needing employee monitoring tools. |
Harvest |
Toggl Track’s invoicing capabilities are less developed than Harvest’s, which integrates directly with PayPal and Stripe for seamless client payments.
Toggl’s mobile app has reported bugs, and its lack of native payroll integrations limits its appeal for businesses needing end-to-end financial workflows compared to Harvest’s ecosystem. |
Time Doctor |
Toggl Track lacks Time Doctor’s productivity-focused features like distraction alerts and website/app monitoring, which are valuable for remote teams.
Its reporting, while customizable, doesn’t include activity-level tracking or screenshots, so it limits the use for detailed employee oversight compared to Time Doctor’s holistic approach. |
Clockify |
Toggl Track’s paid plans ($9/user/month) are pricier than Clockify’s ($3.99-$11.99/user/month), which offers similar features at a lower cost.
Clockify’s free plan supports unlimited users, while Toggl’s is capped at 5, therefore, it is not scalable for larger teams. Toggl’s advanced features, like invoicing, are also less robust than Clockify’s. |
Everhour |
Toggl Track’s project management features are less structured than Everhour’s, which offers better task organization and Asana integration for remote teams.
Toggl’s lack of two-factor authentication for all users and HIPAA compliance makes it less secure for certain industries compared to Everhour’s more robust security options. |
Timely |
Toggl Track’s reliance on manual input for some features can be less efficient than Timely’s automated time-syncing via integrations. It lacks Timely’s hands-off approach to tracking, which may appeal to users already using integrated tools.
Toggl’s project management dashboard is also less comprehensive for large-scale project tracking. |