Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Calendar Software » Toggl Track
Toggl Track is a widely used time tracking solution designed for individuals, teams, and enterprises. It focuses on ease of use and high adoption, offering real-time, manual, and automated time tracking across devices.
With advanced reporting, billing, and profitability insights, Toggl Track helps organizations improve productivity, manage projects accurately, and make data-driven decisions without intrusive employee monitoring.
Plan |
Price |
Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (Free Forever) | Up to 5 users, Web/mobile/desktop tracking, Basic productivity reports |
| Starter | $10/user/mo (Billed Monthly) / $9/user/mo (Billed Annually) | Billable rates, Project estimates & alerts, Team-level reports |
| Premium | $20/user/mo (Billed Monthly) / $18/user/mo (Billed Annually) | Profitability analysis, Timesheet approvals, Customizable reports & SSO |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | Dedicated customer success manager, Custom integrations, Volume discounts |
Price details: https://toggl.com/track/pricing/
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Clockify | Toggl Track offers a cleaner interface and faster onboarding than Clockify. Users often find Toggl easier to adopt across teams, with more intuitive reporting and better calendar-based tracking, while still maintaining competitive pricing for small to mid-sized teams. |
| Harvest | Compared to Harvest, Toggl Track provides more flexible and customizable reports, along with stronger automation features. It suits teams that want deeper productivity and profitability insights without adding complex workflows or rigid billing structures. |
| Hubstaff | Toggl Track stands out for its privacy-first approach, avoiding screenshots and surveillance. This makes it easier to gain employee trust while still delivering accurate time data and powerful analytics, unlike Hubstaff’s more monitoring-heavy style. |
| Timely | While Timely focuses heavily on AI tracking, Toggl Track provides greater transparency and manual control. Teams appreciate Toggl’s balance of automation and user input, plus its broader integrations and more accessible entry-level pricing. |
| TimeCamp | Toggl Track excels over TimeCamp in usability and reporting depth. Its interface feels more modern and intuitive, and its advanced profitability and utilization reports better support agencies and professional services teams. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Clockify | Clockify offers more features on its free tier for larger teams, whereas Toggl Track limits free usage to five users. This can make Toggl less attractive for growing teams that want to avoid early upgrades. |
| Harvest | Harvest provides built-in expense tracking that Toggl Track lacks. Teams needing combined time and expense management may find Toggl requires additional tools or integrations to match Harvest’s functionality. |
| Hubstaff | Hubstaff includes workforce monitoring features like screenshots and GPS tracking, which Toggl Track intentionally avoids. For organizations that require strict oversight, Toggl may feel too lightweight. |
| Timely | Timely’s AI-driven automatic tracking is more hands-off than Toggl Track’s automation. Users seeking minimal manual input may find Toggl still requires more interaction to maintain accurate logs. |
| TimeCamp | TimeCamp’s pricing can be lower at entry levels, especially for small teams. Toggl Track’s Starter and Premium plans may feel expensive for users who only need basic time tracking features. |
