Accruent Enterprise Asset Management Software

Enterprise-grade asset lifecycle management with predictive, compliant maintenance tools

Updated March 28, 2026

Accruent Enterprise Asset Management Software Overview

Accruent Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) software helps asset‑intensive organizations manage assets across their full lifecycle. It combines CMMS, preventive and predictive maintenance, IoT monitoring, compliance reporting, and engineering document management.

Suitable for regulated industries, Accruent EAM reduces downtime, improves audit readiness, and extends asset life through centralized data, real‑time analytics, and scalable cloud or on‑premise deployment options.

Key Features

  • Work Order Management: Centralized creation, tracking, and completion of work orders with full audit trails.
  • Preventive & Predictive Maintenance: Rule‑based scheduling and IoT‑driven alerts to reduce unplanned downtime.
  • Asset Lifecycle Tracking: Manage assets from acquisition through disposal with performance history.
  • Compliance & Reporting: E‑signatures, version control, and audit‑ready compliance reports.
  • Engineering Document Management: Direct access to up‑to‑date drawings and documents within work orders.
  • IoT Remote Monitoring: Real‑time sensor data to detect anomalies and trigger automated maintenance.

Pricing

Plan Price Featured
Maintenance Connection – Professional US $110 / user / month (Billed Monthly, 1‑year minimum) / US $1,325 / user / year (Billed Annually) Unlimited work orders, Preventive maintenance scheduling, Inventory & compliance reporting
Maintenance Connection – Mobile Add‑On US $58 / user / month (Billed Monthly, Add‑On) / US $700 / user / year (Billed Annually) Barcode & QR scanning, Mobile inventory management, Images & e‑signatures
Maintenance Connection – Enterprise Custom Quote (5+ users, 1‑year minimum) Multi‑site scalability, Advanced dashboards, Native IoT & EDMS integration
RedEye – Basic US $1,333 / month (Billed Monthly) / US $16,000 / year (Billed Annually) Unlimited users, OCR search, Engineering drawing markups
RedEye – Advanced US $4,000 / month (Billed Monthly) / US $48,000 / year (Billed Annually) Custom metadata, CAD tag extraction, Third‑party integrations
RedEye – Enterprise US $6,666 / month (Billed Monthly) / US $80,000 / year (Billed Annually) Custom workflows, PowerBI dashboards, Expanded API access
Space Intelligence – Basic US $833 / month (Billed Monthly) / US $10,000 / year (Billed Annually) Portfolio mapping, Space utilization analytics, Forecasting models
Space Intelligence – Advanced US $2,500 / month (Billed Monthly) / US $30,000 / year (Billed Annually) Scenario planning, Indoor mapping, Advanced space optimization

Price details: https://www.accruent.com/product-pricing

Pros

Competitor

Pros
IBM Maximo Compared to IBM Maximo, Accruent EAM is easier to configure and deploy, with lower upfront complexity. Users often prefer Accruent’s more intuitive UI and faster onboarding, especially for mid‑to‑large organizations that need enterprise functionality without heavy IT overhead or extended implementation timelines.
SAP EAM Accruent offers more flexible pricing and faster time‑to‑value than SAP EAM. It suits organizations that want strong maintenance, compliance, and asset tracking without deep dependency on SAP ecosystems, making it easier to adopt for teams without extensive ERP customization resources.
Infor EAM Against Infor EAM, Accruent stands out for document‑centric workflows and engineering integration. Industries with strict regulatory or documentation needs benefit from tighter control of drawings, procedures, and compliance records directly within maintenance workflows.
HxGN EAM Accruent is often seen as more approachable and quicker to learn than HxGN EAM. Maintenance teams appreciate its user‑friendly design and mobile options, which reduce training time while still delivering enterprise‑grade reporting and asset visibility.
Fiix Compared to Fiix, Accruent delivers deeper enterprise scalability, stronger compliance controls, and advanced document management. It is better suited for highly regulated, asset‑intensive organizations that require multi‑site governance rather than lightweight CMMS functionality.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
IBM Maximo Compared to IBM Maximo, Accruent may lack some extremely advanced asset analytics and AI‑driven optimization features that very large global enterprises rely on. Organizations with highly complex asset networks might find Maximo’s advanced modules more suitable.
SAP EAM When compared with SAP EAM, Accruent has less native ERP depth. Companies already deeply invested in SAP financials and logistics may face additional integration work to achieve the same end‑to‑end process automation.
Infor EAM Infor EAM offers broader industry‑specific templates out of the box. Accruent users may need more configuration effort to tailor workflows for niche operational requirements, especially in highly specialized manufacturing environments.
HxGN EAM HxGN EAM can provide deeper GIS and spatial asset capabilities. Accruent’s spatial features are more limited, which may be a drawback for utilities or infrastructure operators needing advanced geospatial asset visualization.
Fiix Fiix is generally more affordable for small teams. Accruent’s enterprise pricing and minimum user requirements can be a barrier for smaller organizations seeking a lightweight CMMS without long‑term contracts.