Apryse-Document-Generation-Automation-favicon

Apryse Document Generation & Automation

Enterprise-grade SDKs for automated document generation, workflows, and Microsoft Office templates

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

Apryse Document Generation & Automation Overview

  • Updated February 9, 2026

Apryse Document Generation & Automation provides developer-focused SDKs and template tools to generate PDFs and Office documents from structured data.

It supports client-side and server-side deployment, advanced workflows like digital signatures and redaction, and Microsoft Office-based template authoring via Fluent. The platform is designed for scalable, secure, and customizable document automation across industries.

Key Features

  • Template-Based Document Generation: Populate PDF and Office templates using JSON, XML, or database data.
  • Microsoft Office Fluent Designer: Author and maintain templates directly in Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.
  • Cross-Platform SDKs: Generate and process documents on web, server, desktop, and mobile environments.
  • Complete Document Workflows: Supports digital signatures, redaction, conversion, and PDF/A compliance.
  • Advanced Formatting Support: Dynamic tables, images, charts, bookmarks, and accessibility tagging.
  • Flexible Deployment Options: Java, .NET, REST API, and Docker-based deployments.

Price

Plan

Price

Featured
Server SDK Custom Quote (Usage & Deployment Based) Server-side automation, 30+ file formats, no third-party dependencies
Mobile SDK Custom Quote (Usage Based) Native mobile viewing, large file support, customizable UI
Fluent Custom Quote (Template Volume & Data Sources) MS Office template authoring, 150+ data integrations, batch reporting
WebViewer Custom Quote (Client-side Licensing) 120+ file types, fast rendering, PDF editing in browser
Xodo Paid (Purchase Required) Cross-platform viewing, editing, conversion tools
Xodo Sign Paid (Subscription) E-signatures, approval workflows, secure document sharing

Price details: https://apryse.com/pricing

Pros

Competitor

Pros
Docmosis Compared to Docmosis, Apryse offers broader SDK functionality beyond document generation, including viewing, annotation, and conversion. It provides stronger support for complex PDFs and enterprise workflows, making it better suited for teams needing an all-in-one document processing stack rather than a narrower template engine.
Formstack Documents Apryse provides deeper developer control and on-premise deployment options, unlike Formstack Documents’ SaaS-first approach. This makes Apryse more flexible for regulated environments and applications requiring custom integrations, performance tuning, or full ownership of document workflows.
Windward Studios Apryse Fluent integrates tightly with Microsoft Office while also supporting broader SDK-based automation. It offers more end-to-end document capabilities, including signing and conversion, whereas Windward focuses primarily on reporting, giving Apryse an advantage for multi-step document processes.
PandaDoc Unlike PandaDoc’s sales-centric platform, Apryse is API-driven and highly customizable. It fits better into complex software products where document generation must be embedded deeply, offering stronger control over formatting, data sources, and deployment environments.
Adobe PDF SDK Apryse is often considered easier to integrate and more cost-predictable than Adobe’s SDKs. It provides comparable PDF manipulation features while offering additional tools like Fluent for Office-based template creation, reducing reliance on proprietary Adobe ecosystems.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
Docmosis Compared to Docmosis, Apryse can feel heavier to adopt for teams that only need simple document generation. Its broader SDK scope and enterprise focus may introduce additional setup complexity that smaller teams do not require.
Formstack Documents Formstack Documents offers faster onboarding for non-technical users. Apryse, by contrast, requires developer involvement and SDK integration, which can slow adoption for business teams seeking quick, no-code document automation.
Windward Studios Windward’s reporting tools are more opinionated and simpler for BI-style reports. Apryse Fluent provides greater flexibility, but this comes with a steeper learning curve for template designers unfamiliar with advanced Office-based automation.
PandaDoc PandaDoc includes built-in CRM and sales workflow features out of the box. Apryse lacks these business-facing tools, requiring additional development if teams want proposal tracking, analytics, or customer-facing document management.
Adobe PDF SDK Adobe benefits from strong brand recognition and ecosystem integration. Apryse may require more evaluation and internal justification, especially in organizations already standardized on Adobe tools and licensing agreements.

Verified Customer Reviews

  • G2 Review (Rating: 4.3/5): Users praise its reliability and ability to handle complex, data-rich documents, while some mention that pricing is not transparent and requires sales involvement.
  • Reddit/r/softwaredevelopment Review (Rating: 4/5): Developers describe the tools as very robust and flexible, but note that the platform has a learning curve and less community visibility than larger competitors.
  • TrustRadius Review (Rating: 3.25/5): Reviewers appreciate the powerful viewing and processing features, while pointing out that setup and licensing discussions can take time for new customers.
  • G2 Pros & Cons Review (Rating: 4.3/5): Users like the straightforward setup and speed, while mentioning that enterprise-focused pricing and configuration can be challenging for smaller teams.