Home » Auto Repair Software » Collision Repair & Estimating Software » CCC ONE Collision Estimating Software
CCC ONE Collision Estimating Software is a comprehensive platform used by tens of thousands of collision repair shops to create accurate, insurer-aligned estimates. It combines AI-driven estimating, parts sourcing, diagnostics workflows, and insurer connectivity into one system.
Designed to reduce cycle times and improve consistency, CCC ONE supports repairers, insurers, and OEMs across the entire collision repair ecosystem.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| CCC ONE Estimating (Estimated) | ~$1,750/mo (Custom Quote) | AI-powered estimating, insurer connectivity, build sheets access |
| CCC ONE Estimating + Management (Estimated) | ~$2,750/mo (Custom Quote, ~5 users) | Full shop management, invoicing, multi-user access |
Price details: https://www.cccis.com/collision-repairers/estimating
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Mitchell Estimating | Compared to Mitchell, CCC ONE offers broader insurer connectivity and stronger DRP alignment, making it easier for shops to receive assignments and approvals. Its interface is often considered more readable and standardized, reducing back-and-forth with insurers and helping estimators work faster with fewer revisions. |
| Audatex | CCC ONE is generally easier to learn than Audatex, with clearer workflows and more intuitive estimating tools. Shops benefit from deeper integration with parts suppliers and management features, reducing the need for third-party tools and improving overall operational efficiency. |
| Shopmonkey | While Shopmonkey focuses on general shop management, CCC ONE excels in collision-specific estimating accuracy. Its OEM data, insurer rules, and collision labor logic are more robust, making it better suited for high-volume collision repair environments. |
| Protractor | CCC ONE provides a more unified estimating and insurer communication experience than Protractor. Its built-in diagnostics workflows and AI-assisted estimate writing reduce manual steps and help shops maintain consistency across technicians and locations. |
| Alldata Collision | Compared to Alldata Collision, CCC ONE offers stronger estimating automation and insurer acceptance. The platform’s scale, real-time data, and ecosystem integrations make it more efficient for shops handling complex repairs and multiple insurer relationships. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Mitchell Estimating | Compared to Mitchell, CCC ONE can be significantly more expensive, especially for smaller shops. Its pricing structure is less transparent, and some users feel locked into insurer-driven processes that reduce flexibility in how estimates are written. |
| Audatex | CCC ONE may feel more rigid than Audatex for advanced or non-standard repairs. Power users sometimes report extra clicks and limited customization, which can slow down highly experienced estimators working on unique collision scenarios. |
| Shopmonkey | Compared to Shopmonkey’s modern, cloud-first UX, CCC ONE can feel complex and enterprise-heavy. Smaller teams may find the onboarding process longer and the interface less intuitive for non-collision administrative tasks. |
| Protractor | CCC ONE is generally more costly and requires deeper training than Protractor. Shops that prioritize lightweight estimating over full ecosystem integration may find CCC ONE excessive for their needs. |
| Alldata Collision | Compared to Alldata Collision, CCC ONE’s pricing and contract terms can be restrictive. Some shops report less flexibility in data presentation and repair logic customization when compared to more documentation-focused platforms. |
