| Calendly |
Easy!Appointments has no recurring subscription fees, making it far more cost-effective long term. Unlike Calendly’s SaaS model, it can be fully self-hosted, giving businesses complete data ownership and customization flexibility, which is especially valuable for technical teams or regulated environments. |
| Acuity Scheduling |
Compared to Acuity, Easy!Appointments offers greater freedom to modify core functionality and database logic. It avoids per-user pricing and works well for developers who want to deeply tailor scheduling workflows without being constrained by preset feature tiers. |
| SimplyBook.me |
Easy!Appointments removes booking limits and commission-based pricing seen in SimplyBook.me. Its open-source nature allows unlimited appointments and providers, making it suitable for growing organizations that prefer infrastructure control over convenience-focused SaaS tools. |
| Setmore |
Unlike Setmore’s freemium restrictions, Easy!Appointments delivers full functionality at no cost. It is better suited for businesses with in-house technical resources that want a stable, long-term solution without feature caps or forced upgrades. |
| Zoho Bookings |
Easy!Appointments is simpler to deploy independently and does not require adoption of a broader ecosystem like Zoho. This makes it easier to integrate into existing systems without vendor lock-in or dependency on bundled enterprise tools. |