Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Document Generation Software » LarkSuite Document Generation Software
LarkSuite Document Generation Software helps organizations automate the creation, editing, and management of documents using templates and real-time data.
As part of the Lark all-in-one collaboration platform, it supports collaborative editing, bulk document generation, access control, and version tracking.
Businesses use it to improve efficiency, reduce manual errors, and deliver consistent, compliant documents at scale.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $0 (Free Forever) | Up to 20 users, Core document creation tools, Team collaboration features |
| Pro | $12/user/mo (Billed Monthly) | Advanced document automation, Enhanced security controls, Increased storage |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | Enterprise-grade security, Custom integrations, Dedicated support |
Price details: https://www.larksuite.com/en_us/plans
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Google Docs | Lark offers stronger built-in automation and document generation workflows, whereas Google Docs focuses mainly on manual creation. Lark’s integrated chat, tasks, and approvals reduce context switching and improve efficiency for teams handling high document volumes. |
| Microsoft Word | Compared to Microsoft Word, Lark is easier to deploy for teams seeking cloud-first collaboration. Its real-time co-authoring, auto-saving, and automation tools simplify document generation without relying on desktop installations or complex add-ins. |
| Notion | Lark provides more structured document templates and automation suited for contracts and operational documents. Notion excels at knowledge bases, but Lark performs better for standardized, repeatable document generation in business workflows. |
| Coda | While Coda is flexible, Lark is more cost-effective for larger teams and simpler to adopt. Lark’s document generation features are tightly integrated with chat and approvals, reducing setup time and ongoing maintenance. |
| PandaDoc | Lark is broader in scope, combining document generation with collaboration and internal workflows. PandaDoc focuses heavily on sales documents, while Lark supports a wider range of operational and internal use cases at a lower entry cost. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Google Docs | Google Docs has a more mature ecosystem of third-party add-ons for document automation. Lark’s marketplace is growing but still more limited, which may restrict advanced or niche document generation scenarios. |
| Microsoft Word | Microsoft Word offers deeper offline capabilities and advanced formatting options. Lark relies primarily on cloud access, which may be less suitable for organizations with limited internet connectivity or strict desktop-based workflows. |
| Notion | Notion provides more flexibility for highly customized databases and layouts. Lark’s document generation is more structured, which can feel restrictive for teams wanting free-form document design. |
| Coda | Coda supports deeper formula logic and app-like documents. Lark’s automation is easier to use but less powerful for complex, data-heavy document logic. |
| PandaDoc | PandaDoc includes built-in e-signature and sales analytics tailored for revenue teams. Lark requires integrations or additional setup to fully match those specialized sales-focused capabilities. |
