Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Screen Sharing Software » Microsoft Screen Sharing App
Microsoft Screen Sharing App is a core feature of Microsoft Teams that lets users share their entire screen, specific apps, or presentations during meetings. It supports collaboration with tools like annotations, digital whiteboards, presenter controls, and audio sharing.
Available across desktop and mobile devices, it’s designed for remote work, training, brainstorming, and real-time collaboration within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Teams Free | $0 (Free) | Screen sharing, 60‑minute meetings, up to 100 participants |
| Microsoft 365 Personal | $9.99/mo (Billed Monthly) / $99.99/year (Billed Annually) | 30‑hour meetings, up to 300 participants, 1 TB OneDrive storage |
| Microsoft 365 Family | $12.99/mo (Billed Monthly) / $129.99/year (Billed Annually) | Up to 6 users, 30‑hour meetings, shared screen collaboration |
| Microsoft 365 Premium | $19.99/mo (Billed Monthly) / $199.99/year (Billed Annually) | Enhanced Copilot features, advanced collaboration, premium security |
Price details: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/compare-microsoft-teams-home-options
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Zoom | Microsoft Teams offers deeper integration with Office apps, making screen sharing more productive for document-heavy workflows. Teams also includes built‑in collaboration tools like Whiteboard and PowerPoint Live, reducing the need for third‑party add‑ons that Zoom users often rely on. |
| Google Meet | Teams provides more advanced presenter and annotation features during screen sharing. Compared to Google Meet’s simplicity, Teams supports richer collaboration such as slide control delegation, integrated whiteboards, and tighter desktop app performance for enterprise users. |
| Slack | Unlike Slack’s basic huddles and screen share, Teams delivers full meeting capabilities with longer durations, higher participant limits, and advanced presentation tools. This makes Teams better suited for structured meetings, training sessions, and formal presentations. |
| Cisco Webex | Teams is generally easier to use and more cost‑effective for small teams already using Microsoft 365. Screen sharing in Teams feels more lightweight and accessible, while still offering strong collaboration features without Webex’s steeper learning curve. |
| Skype | Teams significantly surpasses Skype with modern screen sharing, higher participant limits, and integrated collaboration tools. As Skype is being phased out, Teams provides a more future‑proof and feature‑rich replacement for screen sharing and meetings. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Zoom | Zoom often delivers smoother screen sharing performance on low‑bandwidth connections. Teams screen sharing can feel heavier and may consume more system resources, especially on older devices or when multiple Microsoft 365 apps are running simultaneously. |
| Google Meet | Compared to Google Meet’s minimal interface, Teams can feel cluttered for simple screen sharing needs. New users may find it less intuitive to quickly start sharing without navigating multiple menus and meeting controls. |
| Slack | Slack’s lightweight approach makes quick, informal screen sharing faster to start. Teams, while more powerful, requires structured meetings or calls, which can slow down spontaneous collaboration for small teams. |
| Cisco Webex | Webex offers more granular control and advanced enterprise presentation settings. Teams may lack some of these deep configuration options, which power users in regulated or highly technical environments might miss. |
| Google Workspace | Teams works best inside the Microsoft ecosystem. Users heavily invested in Google Workspace may find screen sharing less seamless, with weaker integration for Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides compared to Google Meet. |
