- Frictionless Mind Mapping: Clean, keyboard-driven interface optimized for rapid idea capture.
- Real-Time Collaboration: Concurrent editing for teams and classrooms on shared maps.
- Cloud & Google Drive Storage: Save maps to MindMup Cloud or manage them directly in Google Drive.
- Rich Exports: Convert mind maps to PDF, PowerPoint, images, and document outlines.
- Publishing with MindMup Atlas: Publish interactive maps online with analytics tracking.
- Enterprise Authentication: Google and Office 365 single sign-on with domain-level controls.
MindMup
Frictionless online mind mapping for brainstorming, planning, and collaboration
Updated February 27, 2026
MindMup Overview
MindMup is a lightweight, browser-based mind mapping tool designed for fast idea capture and distraction-free thinking. It allows users to create unlimited mind maps for free, collaborate in real time, and store maps in the cloud or Google Drive.
MindMup supports exports to PDF and presentations, integrates with Google and Microsoft accounts, and scales from individual note-taking to classroom and organizational use.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (Free Forever) | Unlimited maps, Save/export up to 100 KB, No account required |
| Personal Gold | $2.99/mo (Billed Monthly) / $25/year | Unlimited map size, Private maps, Dedicated email support |
| Team Gold (10 Users) | $50/year | Up to 10 users, Team collaboration, Shared private maps |
| Team Gold (100 Users) | $100/year | Up to 100 users, Centralized billing, Collaborative editing |
| Team Gold (200 Users) | $150/year | Up to 200 users, User management, Large map exports |
| Organizational (Domain) Gold | $100/year (Single Domain) | Unlimited users, SSO with Google/Office 365, Admin sharing controls |
Price details: https://www.mindmup.com/mindmup-gold/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| MindMeister | MindMup offers a far more generous free tier with unlimited maps and no mandatory account creation. Its pricing is significantly lower for individuals and teams, while the interface remains simpler and faster for brainstorming without advanced visual clutter. |
| XMind | Compared to XMind’s desktop-heavy approach, MindMup runs fully in the browser and integrates tightly with Google Drive. This makes it easier to access anywhere, collaborate instantly, and manage files without local installations or licensing complexity. |
| Coggle | MindMup supports larger and more complex maps at a lower price point, with better export options like PowerPoint and document outlines. It also provides organizational controls and domain authentication that Coggle lacks. |
| Lucidchart | MindMup is much cheaper and easier to learn, focusing purely on mind mapping rather than broad diagramming. For users who want fast idea structuring instead of enterprise diagram suites, MindMup feels lighter and more focused. |
| FreeMind | Unlike FreeMind, MindMup requires no installation and supports real-time collaboration and cloud publishing. It also provides professional support options and integrations with modern productivity ecosystems. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| MindMeister | MindMup lacks some of MindMeister’s advanced styling, templates, and polished visual themes, which can matter for presentation-heavy use cases or users who want highly customized, visually rich mind maps. |
| XMind | Compared to XMind’s offline desktop capabilities, MindMup is more dependent on an internet connection for full functionality, which may be limiting for users who need robust offline work. |
| Coggle | MindMup’s interface is more utilitarian and less visually engaging than Coggle’s colorful, presentation-friendly style, which some creative users may prefer for workshops or client-facing sessions. |
| Lucidchart | MindMup does not aim to replace full diagramming suites like Lucidchart and lacks advanced flowcharting, data linking, and enterprise reporting features found in broader visual collaboration platforms. |
| FreeMind | While more modern than FreeMind, MindMup offers fewer deep customization and scripting options that power users of open-source desktop tools may rely on for specialized workflows. |
Reviews
- mindmappingsoftwareblog.com Review: The reviewer calls MindMup a “simple and fast” browser-based tool that makes “excellent use of keyboard shortcuts” for quick idea capture and praises its Google Drive saving and chat integration for collaboration. The Storyboard feature that turns a map into slides earns a “very clever!” remark, although the reviewer hints that it doesn’t fully meet expectations in a few areas.
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.2/5): MindMup delivers what a mind mapping tool should, with “lots of different controls” and “no annoying installation.” Easy collaboration and export options receive positive nods from users who value a straightforward setup.
- Reddit r/mindmapping: One poster shared an example made to test the publish function and admitted “honestly liking Mindmup” after getting used to the “look.” A commenter added that MindMup really is a great mind mapping tool, reinforcing the positive first impression.
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.3/5): A marketing associate highlighted how MindMup helps create a “strategical hierarchy” with tools that draw “unique flows,” giving projects a clear structure for presentations and execution. Another reviewer loved the “adorable” themes and ready-made styles, saying the hierarchy view makes diagrams easy to understand, and neither reported any issues.
- google.com Review: Multiple publications applaud its “zero-friction free online mind mapping” approach and call it “super-simple, lightweight, and generally a joy to use.” Comments emphasize its clean interface that “stays out of your way,” 100% free access, and tight Google Drive integration for creating, saving, sharing, and even embedding mind maps.
- mapify.so Review: The comparison notes real-time co-editing, comments, invitation links, and storage via MindMup Cloud or Google Drive as collaboration strengths. It also points out limits such as a 100KB cap for free users on MindMup Cloud and the lack of advanced editing or AI features, while positioning Gold plans as the option for version history and extended collaboration.
