Sensus-Aviation-MRO-ERP-Software-favicon

Sensus Aviation MRO ERP Software

ERP platform purpose-built for Part 145 aviation MRO organizations

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

Sensus Aviation MRO ERP Software Overview

  • Updated February 4, 2026

Sensus Aviation MRO ERP Software is a cloud-based enterprise platform designed exclusively for Part 145 maintenance, repair, and overhaul providers. It replaces fragmented legacy systems with a unified digital solution covering hangar, shop, and component maintenance.

The system improves compliance, operational visibility, turnaround times, and financial control across base, line, and component maintenance environments.

Key Features

  • Hangar Maintenance Management: Plan and execute routine and non-routine maintenance tasks with real-time labor and material tracking.
  • Shop & Component Maintenance: Manage repair, overhaul, and component work packages with full documentation and compliance reporting.
  • MRO Planning & Scheduling: Use Gantt-based tools for bay scheduling, resource allocation, and long-term capacity planning.
  • Billing & Invoicing: Support flat-rate and time-and-material billing with multi-currency profit tracking.
  • Inventory, Tools & Procurement: Control stock levels, certificates, tooling calibration, and automated reordering.
  • Customer Portal: Provide customers with real-time visibility into job cards, approvals, costs, and project status.

Price

Plan Price Featured
Enterprise MRO Platform Custom Quote (Contact Sales) Full MRO ERP modules, Part 145 compliance support, Dedicated onboarding

 

Pros

Competitor

Pros
Quantum Control Sensus MRO offers a more modern interface and modular architecture, reducing training time and improving usability compared to Quantum Control’s legacy design. It provides stronger real-time visibility across hangar and component operations, while maintaining compatibility with established MRO workflows at a competitive enterprise price point.
AMOS Compared to AMOS, Sensus MRO is typically faster to implement and easier to configure for mid-sized Part 145 providers. It focuses more tightly on operational efficiency and day-to-day maintenance execution, avoiding some of the complexity and higher cost associated with large airline-focused ERP systems.
Ramco Aviation Sensus MRO emphasizes practical MRO workflows and mechanic productivity over broad ERP breadth. It is generally simpler to use, requires less customization, and can be more cost-effective for independent MROs that do not need full airline operations or HR suites.
TRAX Against TRAX, Sensus MRO stands out with quicker deployment and a more intuitive user experience. It delivers strong planning, quoting, and execution tools without the heavy enterprise overhead, making it better suited for growing MRO organizations.
IFS Maintenix Sensus MRO provides a narrower but deeper focus on Part 145 maintenance operations. It avoids the complexity and cost of a broad manufacturing ERP, offering a streamlined solution that aligns closely with hangar, shop, and component maintenance needs.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
Quantum Control Unlike Quantum Control, Sensus MRO has a smaller long-term install base, which may matter to operators seeking extensive third-party integrations or a very large user community. Some legacy operators may also require change management when transitioning from deeply embedded systems.
AMOS Compared to AMOS, Sensus MRO lacks some advanced airline-grade engineering and fleet management capabilities. Very large carriers with complex continuing airworthiness or CAMO requirements may find AMOS more comprehensive despite its higher cost and complexity.
Ramco Aviation Sensus MRO does not provide the same breadth of enterprise HR, payroll, and financial modules included in Ramco Aviation. Organizations seeking a single ERP across all corporate functions may need additional systems alongside Sensus.
TRAX TRAX offers deeper airline-focused functionality and a longer history in very large fleets. Sensus MRO may be less suitable for operators requiring highly customized airline reliability programs or extensive legacy airline integrations.
IFS Maintenix Compared to IFS Maintenix, Sensus MRO is more specialized and may lack broader asset lifecycle and manufacturing capabilities. Enterprises needing tight integration with production, supply chain manufacturing, or defense programs may find Maintenix more appropriate.

Verified Customer Reviews

  • TrustRadius Review (Rating: 8.4/10): Users praise the system’s usability and operational coverage for MRO workflows, while noting that pricing transparency is limited and advanced customization may require vendor support.
  • ITQlick Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Reviewers appreciate the comprehensive feature set and reliable performance, but mention that the platform is best suited for organizations ready to invest in enterprise-level implementation.
  • Smyte Review (Rating: 4.3/5): Users value the modular design and MRO focus, while pointing out that smaller operators may find the system more complex than lightweight maintenance tools.
  • Slashdot Review (Rating: 4.0/5): Feedback highlights strong industry alignment and functionality, with some criticism around the learning curve for teams migrating from legacy systems.
  • SourceForge Review (Rating: 4.2/5): Reviewers note fast implementation and reduced migration risk, while mentioning that full value depends on proper configuration and user training.