- Automated Agenda Management: Create, edit, reuse, and approve agendas with structured workflows and templates.
- Minute Generation: Capture, edit, and publish meeting minutes with private and public versions.
- Document Management: Centralized storage with version control, annotations, redactions, and PDF exports.
- Collaboration Workflows: Collect agenda items, comments, and approvals from multiple stakeholders.
- Public Transparency Portal: Publish meetings, minutes, agendas, and videos for citizen access.
- Flexible Scheduling: Support recurring meetings, special sessions, and multiple boards or subcommittees.
Tylertech Meeting Manager Software
Public-sector meeting planning, agendas, minutes, and citizen transparency platform
Updated March 6, 2026
Tylertech Meeting Manager Software Overview
Tyler Technologies’ Meeting Manager is a cloud-based solution designed for government and public sector organizations to plan, manage, and publish meetings efficiently.
It automates agenda creation, document management, approvals, and minute generation while supporting collaboration across boards and committees. Built for transparency, it also enables public posting, search, and citizen access to meeting records and videos.
Key Features
Pricing
Price is not publicly listed, you need to contact sales.
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| BoardDocs | Compared to BoardDocs, Tyler Meeting Manager offers deeper integration with broader government ERP and civic systems. It is often easier for agencies already using Tyler products to deploy and maintain, reducing integration costs while providing consistent workflows across departments. |
| Granicus | Against Granicus, Meeting Manager is typically simpler to use for internal staff and focuses more on agenda-to-minutes workflows. It suits smaller and mid-sized agencies that want less complexity and lower operational overhead. |
| CivicPlus | Compared with CivicPlus, Tyler’s solution provides stronger native meeting workflows and document controls. Agencies benefit from more robust approval processes and tighter control over agenda items without relying heavily on add-ons. |
| Diligent Boards | Versus Diligent Boards, Meeting Manager is more affordable and purpose-built for public sector compliance. It prioritizes transparency and citizen access rather than private board governance, making it a better fit for municipalities. |
| Fellow | Compared to Fellow, Tyler Meeting Manager offers stronger compliance, records retention, and public posting features. While Fellow excels in private team meetings, Tyler better supports formal government meeting requirements. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| BoardDocs | BoardDocs can feel more polished in its public-facing portals. Compared to it, Tyler Meeting Manager may require more configuration to achieve the same level of visual refinement for citizen-facing pages. |
| Granicus | Granicus offers stronger media streaming and engagement tools. Tyler Meeting Manager’s video handling is more basic, which may limit agencies that prioritize advanced broadcasting and engagement analytics. |
| CivicPlus | CivicPlus provides broader website and communication tools. Tyler Meeting Manager focuses narrowly on meetings, so organizations may need additional products for full digital engagement. |
| Diligent Boards | Diligent Boards delivers a more modern mobile experience for executives. Tyler Meeting Manager can feel less optimized for mobile-first users, especially outside traditional office workflows. |
| Fellow | Fellow is quicker to adopt for small teams. Tyler Meeting Manager has a steeper learning curve due to compliance-focused features and structured workflows designed for government use. |
Reviews
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Tylertech Meeting Manager Software earns high marks for automating the planning and follow-up process, with users highlighting how it handles everything from meeting scheduling to post-meeting tasks in one system. Organizations report that Tylertech Meeting Manager Software helps them run better meetings by keeping preparation and next steps organized instead of scattered across tools.
