Home » Business Automation Tools » Kissflow
Kissflow is an AI-powered low-code application development platform that enables businesses to automate workflows, build custom apps, and integrate systems seamlessly with no-code connectors.
It provides visual data insights, supports rapid process automation, and handles over 2 million transactions annually. Trusted by leading brands like Puma Energy, it boasts high customer satisfaction (94.7%) and is ideal for digital transformation and efficient workflow management.
| Plan Name | Price (per month) | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | $1,500 | Core no‑code/low‑code workflow automation tools for internal users; includes form/workflow builders, app development, reports, integrations, and standard support. |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing | Full platform capabilities, including external user access, private cluster hosting, advanced security, higher usage limits, and premium support—tailored to enterprise requirements. |
Pricing details https://kissflow.com/pricing/
Competitor |
Pros of Kissflow |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Power Apps | Kissflow provides a more cost-effective starting price at $1,500 per month for 50 users, ideal for small to mid-sized teams, compared to Power Apps, which often requires additional Microsoft licenses that increase costs. Its no-code/low-code platform is highly intuitive, enabling faster workflow automation and app development for non-technical users.
Kissflow’s AI-powered features and seamless no-code integrations with tools like Google Workspace and Zapier offer simpler setup and broader accessibility than Power Apps’ dependency on the Microsoft ecosystem. Customer reviews on G2 (4.3/5 from 586 reviews) highlight Kissflow’s ease of use and process management over Power Apps’ more complex setup. |
| Zoho Creator | Kissflow excels with its unified platform for workflow automation and app development, offering robust AI-driven features like decision tables that surpass Zoho Creator’s simpler customization tools. Its drag-and-drop interface and pre-built templates for HR, finance, and procurement enable rapid deployment, ideal for mid-market firms.
With a 4.3/5 G2 rating (586 reviews) compared to Creatio’s 4.7/5 (270 reviews), Kissflow is praised for process management and document approvals, providing better scalability and governance than Zoho Creator’s ecosystem-reliant structure. |
| Nintex | Kissflow is more affordable, starting at $1,500/month for 50 users versus Nintex’s £21,175 annually for 250 users, making it suitable for smaller teams. Its no-code interface is simpler, enabling quick automation without the technical expertise Nintex demands.
Kissflow’s AI capabilities and user-friendly dashboard reduce the learning curve, earning a 4.3/5 G2 rating for ease of use, compared to Nintex’s enterprise focus, which can be complex and costly for smaller organizations. |
| OutSystems | Kissflow offers a lower entry cost and simpler no-code/low-code tools, making it more accessible for non-developers than OutSystems, which requires advanced coding for complex apps. Its pricing transparency ($1,500/month) contrasts with OutSystems’ custom quotes, and its rapid deployment suits mid-sized firms.
Kissflow’s governance and AI features provide efficient workflow management, with G2 reviews (4.3/5) praising its simplicity over OutSystems’ developer-centric approach, which can slow implementation. |
| Mendix | Kissflow’s no-code focus empowers citizen developers, unlike Mendix’s developer-oriented platform, which demands technical skills. Starting at $1,500/month, Kissflow is more affordable and faster to deploy for small to mid-sized teams.
Its AI-driven automation and governance tools offer robust functionality, with G2 reviews (4.3/5) favoring its ease of use and quick setup over Mendix’s complex, high-cost enterprise solutions that may limit accessibility for smaller organizations. |
Competitor |
Cons of Kissflow |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Power Apps | Kissflow lacks the deep integration with Microsoft tools like SharePoint and Dynamics 365, which Power Apps leverages seamlessly, potentially requiring extra configuration for Microsoft-centric businesses. Its advanced features may have a steeper learning curve for users accustomed to Power Apps’ AI-driven design tools.
G2 reviews (4.3/5 vs. Power Apps’ 4.4/5) note Kissflow’s weaker mobile access and occasional bugs, limiting its scalability for massive data transactions compared to Power Apps. |
| Zoho Creator | Kissflow’s starting price of $1,500/month is higher than Zoho Creator’s lower-tier plans, which can deter budget-conscious small businesses. It offers fewer pre-built integrations within the Zoho ecosystem, requiring more setup effort for Zoho users. G2 reviews (4.3/5 vs. Creatio’s 4.7/5) highlight Kissflow’s less intuitive interface for form-building and limited customization of UI elements compared to Zoho Creator’s flexible design options. |
| Nintex | Kissflow struggles with complex, enterprise-scale workflows that Nintex handles efficiently through advanced RPA and document generation. Its analytics and reporting capabilities are less robust, and G2 reviews (4.3/5) note integration issues with enterprise tools like SAP, unlike Nintex’s strong compatibility.
Kissflow’s simpler feature set may require workarounds for intricate processes, making it less suitable for large organizations needing deep customization. |
| OutSystems | Kissflow falls short in full-stack app development and high-performance scalability compared to OutSystems, which excels in complex, mission-critical applications. Its lack of AI-assisted refactoring and limited custom coding options can hinder advanced development.
G2 reviews (4.3/5) point to slower deployment for large-scale apps and weaker enterprise integrations, thus making Kissflow less ideal for organizations requiring OutSystems’ robust, developer-focused architecture. |
| Mendix | Kissflow is less equipped for multi-cloud, high-scalability deployments compared to Mendix’s enterprise-grade architecture. It lacks Mendix’s advanced custom coding extensions, limiting flexibility for complex apps.
G2 reviews (4.3/5 vs. Mendix’s 4.4/5) highlight Kissflow’s integration challenges with systems like SAP and a less robust feature set for large-scale enterprise needs, requiring more effort for advanced app management. |
