Audatex favicon

Audatex Estimating

Industry-grade collision estimating software for fast, accurate auto body repair quotes

Audatex Estimating Overview

Audatex Estimating is a professional collision repair estimating solution used by body shops, insurers, and appraisers. It leverages one of the industry’s most comprehensive databases to deliver highly accurate estimates, labor times, and parts pricing.

With advanced 3D graphics, VIN decoding, and integrated add-ons, Audatex streamlines estimating while improving compliance, efficiency, and customer satisfaction.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive Estimating Database: Generates accurate, defendable estimates using one of the most widely accepted collision repair data sources.
  • 3D Vehicle Graphics: Interactive 360-degree visuals with zoom and color-coded parts for faster, more precise part selection.
  • VIN Decoding: Automatically retrieves correct parts, labor times, and pricing for vehicles dating back to 1970.
  • Accurate Labor Calculations: Automatically accounts for duplicate and related labor operations to ensure precise estimates.
  • Integrated Add-ons: Includes digital imaging, estimate compliance tools, frame dimensions, paintless dent repair, and parts locating.
  • AutoWatch Customer Communication: Sends automated SMS and email updates with photos to keep customers informed throughout repairs.

Price

Plan Price Featured
Audatex Estimating Custom Quote (Contact Sales) Comprehensive collision estimating database; 3D vehicle graphics and VIN decoding; Weekly updated OE parts pricing and labor times

 

Pros

Competitor

Pros

CCC ONE Compared to CCC ONE, Audatex is often praised for its detailed estimating logic that automatically includes required operations. This reduces manual guesswork and rework, helping experienced estimators write faster, more thorough estimates with fewer supplements while maintaining strong industry acceptance.
Mitchell Cloud Estimating Audatex stands out against Mitchell by offering highly interactive 3D graphics and point-and-click part selection. These visuals can significantly speed up the estimating process and improve accuracy, particularly for complex repairs where correct part identification is critical.
GT Motive Versus GT Motive, Audatex provides broader vehicle coverage in North America and deeper integration with insurers. Its database depth and weekly pricing updates make it more suitable for high-volume professional body shops and insurance-driven repair workflows.
ALLDATA Collision Compared to ALLDATA Collision, Audatex focuses more on end-to-end estimating efficiency rather than repair procedures alone. Shops benefit from faster estimate creation, automated labor calculations, and seamless add-ons that reduce reliance on multiple disconnected tools.
EstimateOne Against EstimateOne, Audatex excels in estimator control and database authority. While EstimateOne emphasizes digital intake and photos, Audatex provides deeper estimating intelligence, making it better suited for professional estimators handling insurer-compliant collision repairs.

Cons

Competitor

Cons

CCC ONE Compared to CCC ONE, Audatex can feel less beginner-friendly for new estimators. Its depth and automation assume industry knowledge, which may increase training time for smaller shops without experienced staff.
Mitchell Cloud Estimating Versus Mitchell, Audatex pricing transparency is lower, as costs require direct sales engagement. This can make upfront budgeting more difficult for shops that prefer clearly published, tier-based pricing models.
GT Motive Compared with GT Motive, Audatex is less flexible for international or non–North American markets. Shops operating across regions may find GT Motive more adaptable, whereas Audatex is optimized for U.S. and Canadian workflows.
ALLDATA Collision Against ALLDATA Collision, Audatex places less emphasis on step-by-step OEM repair procedures. Shops that prioritize detailed repair instructions alongside estimates may need supplemental tools.
EstimateOne Compared to EstimateOne’s modern, photo-first experience, Audatex can feel more traditional in its interface. Some users may find the UI less intuitive, particularly when transitioning from mobile-centric estimating platforms.

Verified Customer Reviews