Home » CMMS Software » Web Based CMMS Software » UpKeep
UpKeep is a cloud-based, mobile-first CMMS designed to streamline maintenance, reliability, and asset operations. It unifies work orders, preventive maintenance, assets, inventory, analytics, and AI-powered insights in one platform.
Built for technicians and managers alike, UpKeep helps organizations reduce downtime, improve asset health, and gain real-time operational visibility across single or multi-site environments.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Essential | $20/mo per user (Billed Monthly) | Unlimited work orders, Asset management, AI intelligence suite |
| Premium | $55/mo per user (Billed Monthly) | Preventive maintenance optimization, Inventory management, Analytics & reporting (30 days) |
| Professional | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | Advanced analytics, Mobile offline mode, Custom request portal |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | Multi-site management, Workflow automation, API & custom integrations |
Price details: https://upkeep.com/pricing/
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| MaintainX | Compared to MaintainX, UpKeep offers more advanced asset management and enterprise scalability. Its AI-powered features and deeper analytics are better suited for organizations with complex maintenance operations, while still remaining accessible to technicians through a polished mobile app. |
| Fiix | UpKeep is generally easier to deploy and use than Fiix, especially for mobile-first teams. It requires less configuration upfront and provides a cleaner interface, making it more approachable for organizations that want faster adoption without sacrificing core CMMS functionality. |
| Hippo CMMS | Against Hippo CMMS, UpKeep stands out with stronger mobile capabilities and AI-driven automation. It supports larger teams and multi-site operations more effectively, while offering more robust analytics and preventive maintenance optimization. |
| Limble CMMS | While Limble focuses on simplicity, UpKeep provides a broader feature set for growing organizations. It balances ease of use with advanced capabilities like inventory costing, downtime tracking, and enterprise integrations. |
| IBM Maximo | Compared to IBM Maximo, UpKeep is significantly more affordable and faster to implement. It avoids heavy customization requirements while still delivering modern CMMS and EAM features suitable for mid-market and enterprise users. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| MaintainX | MaintainX can feel more lightweight, but some users find UpKeep more expensive at scale. Smaller teams that only need basic work order tracking may find MaintainX more cost-effective and simpler for limited maintenance needs. |
| Fiix | Fiix offers deeper out-of-the-box reliability engineering tools. Organizations with highly technical asset reliability programs may find UpKeep’s advanced analytics less specialized without moving to higher-tier or enterprise plans. |
| Hippo CMMS | Hippo CMMS can be cheaper for small facilities, whereas UpKeep’s per-user pricing can add up. Teams with very simple maintenance workflows may not fully utilize UpKeep’s broader feature set. |
| Limble CMMS | Limble is often praised for faster onboarding and simpler workflows. In comparison, UpKeep may feel more complex initially due to its extensive configuration options and enterprise-grade capabilities. |
| IBM Maximo | While easier than Maximo, UpKeep lacks some of the extreme customization and industry-specific modules that very large enterprises rely on. Organizations needing highly regulated, bespoke asset management may still prefer Maximo. |
