Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Plagiarism Checker Software » Papersowl Free Plagiarism Checker
PapersOwl Free Plagiarism Checker is an online tool designed for students to detect duplicate content and ensure academic originality. It supports unlimited word checks, multiple file formats, and real-time scanning across web and academic databases.
The tool emphasizes speed, data safety, and ease of use, while also offering optional paid editing, rewriting, and writing services when plagiarism is detected.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plagiarism Checker | $0 (Free) | Unlimited word count, Real-time plagiarism scan, Source similarity report |
| Editing Service | $7 (Starting price) | Proofreading and polishing, Up to 50% text editing, Plagiarism risk reduction |
| Rewriting Service | $8 (Starting price) | Rewrite up to 75% of content, Improve originality score, Academic-ready output |
| Writing Service | $18 (Starting price) | Custom paper from scratch, Instruction-based writing, Plagiarism-free delivery |
Price details: https://papersowl.com/free-plagiarism-checker
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Grammarly | PapersOwl offers unlimited free plagiarism checks, while Grammarly restricts plagiarism detection to paid tiers. Students who need frequent scans without cost benefit from PapersOwl’s accessibility. The interface is also simpler, avoiding the broader grammar-focused features that can overwhelm users who only need originality checks. |
| Turnitin | Unlike Turnitin, which is institution-locked, PapersOwl is directly accessible to individual students. It allows pre-submission checks without academic penalties. This makes it more practical for early draft reviews, especially for independent learners or those without university-provided access. |
| Quetext | PapersOwl removes word-count limitations entirely, while Quetext’s free version is capped. This is advantageous for long essays and research papers. PapersOwl also integrates optional human editing services, which Quetext does not provide in the same workflow. |
| SmallSEOTools | Compared to SmallSEOTools, PapersOwl is more student-focused, with clearer academic plagiarism explanations. It avoids aggressive ads and CAPTCHA interruptions, offering a smoother checking experience for repeated academic use. |
| Scribbr | Scribbr relies on premium Turnitin-based reports, whereas PapersOwl provides instant free scans. For students who cannot afford paid reports, PapersOwl offers a faster, zero-cost way to identify major originality issues before final submission. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Grammarly | Compared to Grammarly’s plagiarism engine, PapersOwl may miss some subtle paraphrased matches. Grammarly’s paid database integration is often perceived as more robust for publication-level checks, making PapersOwl less suitable as a final authority. |
| Turnitin | PapersOwl reports are not institution-recognized like Turnitin’s. Universities typically do not accept PapersOwl reports officially, so students still need access to Turnitin for compliance with academic submission requirements. |
| Quetext | Quetext provides clearer visual similarity maps and citation assistance. PapersOwl’s report presentation is more basic, which can make it harder to analyze complex overlap patterns in heavily referenced research papers. |
| SmallSEOTools | While cleaner than SmallSEOTools, PapersOwl still promotes paid writing services within results. Some users find this distracting and question the objectivity of recommendations when plagiarism is detected. |
| Scribbr | Scribbr’s premium checks use Turnitin’s academic database, which is often deeper than PapersOwl’s coverage. For theses or journal submissions, PapersOwl may not provide sufficient confidence compared to Scribbr’s paid reports. |
