Edison365 Innovation Management Software Favicon

Edison365 Innovation Management Software

Microsoft-powered platform for end-to-end innovation and business transformation

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

Edison365 Innovation Management Software Overview

  • Updated February 28, 2026

Edison365 is an innovation management and project delivery platform built on Microsoft 365. It helps organizations capture ideas, evaluate opportunities, build business cases, and deliver projects in one unified environment.

With deep Microsoft integrations, configurable workflows, and portfolio-level reporting, edison365 supports strategic innovation, continuous improvement, and measurable business transformation across teams.

Key Features

  • End-to-End Innovation Management: Capture, evaluate, justify, and deliver ideas within a single connected platform.
  • Microsoft 365 Integration: Native integration with Microsoft tools, including SSO and Power BI reporting.
  • Configurable Workflows: Design simple or complex workflows tailored to innovation, projects, and programs.
  • Business Case & Portfolio Management: Build standardized business cases and track value, ROI, and impact.
  • Gamified Ideation: Increase engagement with challenges, leaderboards, ratings, and rewards.

Price

Plan Price Featured
Base Contact Sales Gamified ideation, Admin controls, Dashboards & templates
Standard Contact Sales Strategic innovation tools, Business case controls, ROI & impact analysis
Professional Contact Sales Full project & portfolio delivery, Advanced resource planning, Custom reports
Premium Contact Sales Enterprise-grade integrations, Event-driven APIs, Advanced auditing & governance

Price details: https://edison365.com/licensing/

Pros

Competitor

Pros
Brightidea Edison365 offers stronger native Microsoft 365 integration and a more unified path from idea to project delivery. While Brightidea excels at ideation, edison365 reduces the need for external project tools, making it easier for Microsoft-centric organizations to manage innovation and execution in one environment.
IdeaScale Compared to IdeaScale’s focus on crowdsourcing, edison365 provides deeper business case management and portfolio-level governance. Teams that need structured evaluation, resource planning, and compliance benefit from edison365’s broader functionality beyond idea collection.
Planview Edison365 is generally easier to configure and use for innovation-focused teams than Planview. It offers a lighter learning curve while still supporting portfolio management, making it attractive for organizations that want strategic control without enterprise-level complexity.
Jira Unlike Jira’s development-centric approach, edison365 is designed for business innovation and transformation. Non-technical users find edison365 more intuitive for ideation, business cases, and executive reporting, especially in Microsoft-based environments.
Asana Edison365 goes beyond task management by connecting ideas to measurable business value. While Asana is simpler for day-to-day work, edison365 provides stronger governance, ROI tracking, and strategic alignment for innovation initiatives.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
Brightidea Brightidea can feel more purpose-built for large-scale idea campaigns, while edison365’s broader scope may introduce additional configuration overhead for teams that only want lightweight ideation without project delivery features.
IdeaScale IdeaScale’s pricing and deployment are often simpler to understand upfront. Edison365’s contact-sales licensing and Microsoft dependencies may slow decision-making for smaller teams seeking quick, transparent setup.
Planview Planview offers more advanced enterprise portfolio analytics out of the box. Edison365 may require additional configuration or Power BI expertise to reach the same depth of reporting for very large PMOs.
Jira Teams already deeply invested in Jira ecosystems may find edison365 less flexible for software development workflows. Edison365 is less suited for sprint-level engineering management compared to Jira.
Asana Asana’s simplicity and quick onboarding can be more appealing for small teams. Edison365’s richer feature set may feel heavy for users who only need basic task and collaboration functionality.

Verified Customer Reviews

  • Gartner Review (Rating: 4.8/5): One Innovation Manager highlighted the “full Microsoft integration,” simple but effective user interface, and easy configuration, while another reviewer explained that edison365 helped gather and consolidate “revolutionary ideas” through Active Directory sync. A Senior Application Engineer valued the way the platform supports brainstorming and idea validation, noting that customer support guides teams carefully through the ideation and selection phases.
  • Capterra Review (Rating: 4.5/5): One Senior Transformation Manager praised the flexibility and user-friendly setup but struggled with reporting because the data structure felt hard to interpret and portfolio functionality was missing. Another reviewer called it “incredible value for the price” and appreciated how the back-end setup makes it intuitive for users while helping admins move ideas from submission through execution.
  • G2 Review (Rating: 4.6/5): Feedback emphasizes the intuitive interface and ease of use, with comments noting that employees across the organization can quickly manage ideas and projects without steep learning curves.
  • GetApp Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Several reviewers applauded edison365 for strong customer support and smooth Office 365 integration, and one user liked the ability to quickly capture an “aha moment” before fleshing it out later. Pain points included the lack of a weekly periodic table for project resourcing, missing portfolio management features, and categories that automatically appear company-wide, which created challenges for teams running targeted initiatives.