Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Mind Mapping Software » GitMind
GitMind is an all-in-one AI workspace that transforms text, videos, audio, PDFs, images, and websites into structured mind maps, summaries, and diagrams.
Designed as an AI second brain, it supports brainstorming, studying, teaching, and project planning with tools like AI flowcharts, UML diagrams, YouTube summarization, OCR, and multi-platform collaboration across desktop, mobile, and web.
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | $0 (Free) | Up to 10 mind maps and whiteboards, Limited image uploads, Sync across platforms |
| Pro – Monthly | $9/mo (Billed Monthly) | Unlimited mind maps, HD export, Priority support |
| Pro – Annual | $4.08/mo (Billed Annually) | Unlimited mind maps, HD export, Priority support |
| Pro – 3 Year Plan | $79 one-time (Non-subscription, 3 Years) | Same benefits as Pro, Stackable duration, Cross-platform access |
| Metered License (AI Credits) | Custom Quote | Pay-as-you-go AI credits, Unlock specific AI tools, Flexible usage |
Price details: https://gitmind.com/pricing
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| MindMeister | GitMind offers broader AI-powered summarization for videos, audio, and documents, while MindMeister focuses mainly on traditional mind mapping. GitMind is generally more affordable and includes AI tools even on lower tiers, making it better suited for students and professionals seeking an all-in-one visual workspace. |
| XMind | Compared to XMind, GitMind emphasizes automation through AI, enabling faster creation of maps from files and media. GitMind’s web-based collaboration and cloud sync are simpler for teams, while XMind relies more on manual structuring and desktop-first workflows. |
| Miro | GitMind is easier to use and significantly cheaper than Miro for individuals. While Miro excels at large team whiteboarding, GitMind focuses on AI-driven organization, summarization, and learning workflows, reducing setup time for solo users, educators, and small teams. |
| Whimsical | GitMind provides stronger AI features such as document and video summarization, which Whimsical lacks. For users who want automated insights rather than manual diagramming, GitMind delivers more value, especially at a lower entry price. |
| Lucidchart | Lucidchart focuses on enterprise-grade diagramming, while GitMind prioritizes speed and simplicity with AI assistance. GitMind is more accessible for students and individuals, offering faster idea-to-visual workflows without complex configuration or higher enterprise costs. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| MindMeister | While GitMind has stronger AI tools, it lacks some of MindMeister’s mature team management and integration options. Large organizations that prioritize structured collaboration and deep integrations may find GitMind less robust for complex, multi-department workflows. |
| XMind | XMind provides more advanced manual customization and offline capabilities. GitMind’s reliance on cloud and AI features can feel limiting for users who prefer complete control over layouts or need extensive offline editing. |
| Miro | Miro outperforms GitMind in real-time collaboration for large teams. GitMind’s collaboration features are simpler and may not scale as well for enterprise workshops, agile ceremonies, or complex multi-cursor brainstorming sessions. |
| Whimsical | Whimsical offers a more polished design experience for UI and flow diagrams. GitMind’s visuals, while functional, may feel less refined for designers who prioritize aesthetics and pixel-level control. |
| Lucidchart | Lucidchart provides stronger compliance, security controls, and enterprise features. GitMind may not meet strict corporate requirements for governance, advanced permissions, or regulated environments. |
