Miro is a visual collaboration platform that combines an infinite online whiteboard with AI-powered workflows, structured formats, and deep integrations. Teams use it for brainstorming, workshops, product planning, diagramming, and agile ceremonies.
With templates, Talktracks, and enterprise-grade security, Miro supports everything from quick ideation sessions to large-scale, cross-functional collaboration across distributed organizations.
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1 workspace with 3 editable boards; 5,000+ templates; 10 AI credits/month per team |
| Starter | $8/member/mo (Billed Annually) / $10/member/mo (Billed Monthly) | Unlimited boards; Unlimited Talktracks; 25 AI credits/month per member |
| Business | $20/member/mo (Billed Annually) / $25/member/mo (Billed Monthly) | Multiple private workspaces; Advanced diagramming (3,900+ shapes); 50 AI credits/member/month |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing (From 30 members) | SCIM & advanced admin controls; Enterprise-grade security & data residency; 100 AI credits/member/month |
Price details: https://miro.com/pricing/
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Mural | Miro offers a more generous free plan and broader AI capabilities, including structured Docs and Tables directly on the canvas. Its integration ecosystem (160+ apps) and advanced diagramming library make it more versatile for both creative workshops and technical teams compared to Mural’s more facilitation-focused environment. |
| Lucidspark | Compared to Lucidspark, Miro provides richer product and engineering workflows with built-in diagramming shapes (UML, AWS, Azure) and bi-directional Jira/Azure DevOps integrations. The combination of AI credits, structured formats, and enterprise controls makes Miro more comprehensive for cross-functional collaboration at scale. |
| FigJam | Miro is better suited for large organizations needing security, multiple workspaces, and advanced admin controls. While FigJam excels in design contexts, Miro extends beyond design with roadmap planning, structured tables, and enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, and governance options. |
| Microsoft Whiteboard | Miro delivers significantly more advanced features, including templates, AI-powered content generation, integrations beyond Microsoft 365, and structured documents. For distributed teams running workshops or agile processes, Miro’s facilitation tools and integrations provide a more complete collaboration environment. |
| Conceptboard | Miro’s broader template ecosystem, AI workflows, and advanced diagramming tools give it an edge for product, UX, and engineering teams. Its scalability—from startup to enterprise with security and compliance add-ons—makes it more adaptable for fast-growing organizations than Conceptboard. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Mural | Miro’s interface can feel more complex due to its extensive feature set, whereas Mural’s focused facilitation tools may be easier for non-technical workshop participants. Teams primarily running simple brainstorming sessions might find Miro’s additional formats and AI options unnecessary. |
| Lucidspark | Lucidspark integrates tightly with Lucidchart for diagram-heavy workflows, which may feel more seamless for users already embedded in the Lucid ecosystem. Miro’s pricing for Business and Enterprise tiers can also be higher for smaller teams needing advanced features. |
| FigJam | For design-centric teams already using Figma, FigJam offers a more native, lightweight experience. Miro can feel heavier and less tightly integrated with design file workflows compared to FigJam’s direct connection to Figma prototypes and components. |
| Microsoft Whiteboard | Microsoft Whiteboard is free within many Microsoft environments, making it more cost-effective for basic needs. Miro’s advanced capabilities come at a per-user cost, which may be unnecessary for teams that only require simple whiteboarding inside Microsoft 365. |
| Conceptboard | Conceptboard emphasizes structured feedback and compliance workflows, which may be preferable in regulated industries. Miro’s broader, innovation-focused toolset can require more setup and governance configuration for organizations prioritizing strict review processes. |
