Home » Collaboration & Productivity Software » Internal Communications Software » Slack AI Work Management & Productivity Tools
Slack is an AI-driven work management and productivity platform that centralizes team communication, project coordination, and automation. It combines channels, messaging, documents, workflows, and integrations with popular business tools.
With built-in AI features like conversation summaries, enterprise search, and intelligent agents, Slack helps teams reduce context switching, save time, and collaborate more effectively across organizations.
Plan |
Price |
Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (Forever) | 90-day message history, 1:1 audio/video calls, Basic integrations |
| Pro | $7.25/user/mo (Billed Annually) / $8.75/user/mo (Billed Monthly) | Unlimited message history, Group calls, Workflow Builder |
| Business+ | $15/user/mo (Billed Annually) / $18/user/mo (Billed Monthly) | AI features included, Advanced security, SSO & compliance exports |
| Enterprise Grid | Contact Sales (Custom Pricing) | Unlimited workspaces, Enterprise-grade security, Dedicated support |
Price details: https://slack.com/pricing
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Teams | Slack offers a cleaner interface and more intuitive channel-based communication, making it easier for new users to adopt. Its integrations are platform-agnostic, while Teams works best inside Microsoft ecosystems. Slack’s AI summaries and search feel faster and more context-aware for day-to-day collaboration. |
| Zoom Team Chat | Compared to Zoom’s chat, Slack provides deeper workflow automation and project-oriented communication. Slack’s app ecosystem and AI-driven search make it better suited for continuous work management, not just meeting-centric collaboration. |
| Asana | Slack excels in real-time communication and flexibility, whereas Asana focuses strictly on task management. Teams that prioritize conversation-first workflows benefit from Slack’s faster interactions and seamless task discussions without rigid structures. |
| Notion | Slack is stronger for instant collaboration and quick decision-making. Unlike Notion’s document-heavy approach, Slack reduces friction with live messaging, AI summaries, and integrations that keep work moving without constant page updates. |
| ClickUp | Slack is easier to set up and less overwhelming than ClickUp’s all-in-one interface. Teams that want lightweight coordination with powerful integrations often find Slack more approachable and faster for daily communication. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Teams | Slack can become more expensive at scale compared to Teams, which is bundled with Microsoft 365. Organizations already invested in Microsoft tools may find Slack less cost-efficient and requiring additional admin effort. |
| Zoom Team Chat | Slack lacks Zoom’s advanced meeting controls and webinar features. Teams that rely heavily on video-first collaboration may still need Zoom, increasing tool overlap and overall costs. |
| Asana | Slack’s task management is lighter and less structured than Asana’s. Teams needing detailed timelines, dependencies, and reporting may find Slack insufficient without relying on external integrations. |
| Notion | Slack is not ideal for long-form documentation or knowledge bases. Compared to Notion, information in Slack can feel fragmented over time, even with improved AI search and summaries. |
| ClickUp | Slack does not offer the same depth of native project tracking and reporting as ClickUp. Teams seeking a single system for tasks, docs, and goals may need additional tools alongside Slack. |
