Tyler Technologies Enterprise Asset Management Software

Public sector enterprise asset management for infrastructure, facilities, and community services

Updated April 9, 2026

Tyler Technologies Enterprise Asset Management Software Overview

Tyler Technologies’ Enterprise Asset Management software is purpose-built for public sector organizations to manage assets across their full lifecycle. It helps governments track maintenance, performance, and capital planning while integrating with ERP, permitting, and civic service systems.

The platform supports field and office users with mobile tools, analytics, and citizen-facing service requests to improve reliability, transparency, and long-term asset value.

Key Features

  • Asset Maintenance Management: Track preventive and corrective maintenance, manage work orders, and extend asset lifecycles.
  • Asset Performance Analytics: Analyze asset condition, trends, and lifecycle costs to support long-term planning.
  • Mobile Workforce Tools: Enable field staff to complete and update work orders using mobile applications.
  • Capital Project Tracking: Manage large-scale capital improvement projects and ongoing maintenance programs.
  • ERP and System Integrations: Connect seamlessly with Tyler ERP, permitting, GIS, and financial systems.
  • Citizen Service Requests: Allow residents to submit and track non-emergency service requests online or via mobile.

Pricing

Their prices doesn’t listed on the website, you need to contact sales for custom price.

 

Pros

Competitor

Pros
SAP Enterprise Asset Management Compared to SAP EAM, Tyler EAM is more tailored to public sector workflows, reducing configuration effort and implementation time. Governments often find Tyler easier to adopt, with built-in support for civic services and regulatory needs, whereas SAP typically requires higher upfront cost, longer deployments, and specialized consultants.
IBM Maximo Tyler EAM offers a more government-focused user experience than IBM Maximo, which is heavily industrial. Tyler’s tighter integration with ERP, permitting, and citizen portals simplifies daily operations for municipalities, while Maximo can feel complex and resource-intensive for smaller or mid-sized public agencies.
Infor EAM Compared to Infor EAM, Tyler EAM emphasizes public sector compliance, budgeting, and transparency. Users benefit from preconfigured government use cases and smoother ERP alignment, whereas Infor often requires additional customization to fully meet municipal reporting and governance requirements.
Oracle EAM Tyler EAM is generally simpler to use and deploy than Oracle EAM for government entities. Oracle provides deep enterprise functionality but at higher cost and complexity, while Tyler balances robust asset management with usability and faster time-to-value for cities and counties.
Cityworks Against Cityworks, Tyler EAM offers broader enterprise coverage beyond GIS-centric asset management. Tyler’s ERP and financial integrations provide a more complete picture of asset costs and performance, making it better suited for organizations seeking an all-in-one government technology ecosystem.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
SAP Enterprise Asset Management Compared to SAP EAM, Tyler EAM lacks the same depth of advanced industrial asset optimization and global enterprise tooling. Large multinational organizations may find Tyler less suitable if they require highly specialized manufacturing or utilities asset scenarios supported natively by SAP.
IBM Maximo When measured against IBM Maximo, Tyler EAM offers fewer advanced predictive maintenance and IoT-driven capabilities. Organizations heavily invested in sensor-based monitoring and AI-driven asset optimization may find Maximo more powerful, albeit at the cost of greater complexity and expense.
Infor EAM Compared with Infor EAM, Tyler EAM provides less flexibility for highly customized private-sector asset strategies. Infor can be more adaptable across industries, while Tyler’s strength in government can be limiting for hybrid or quasi-commercial organizations.
Oracle EAM Against Oracle EAM, Tyler EAM may feel less feature-rich for organizations already standardized on Oracle Cloud infrastructure. Oracle offers deeper native integrations within its ecosystem, while Tyler excels mainly within its own public sector-focused platform.
Cityworks Compared to Cityworks, Tyler EAM can be heavier to implement for smaller municipalities. Cityworks’ GIS-first approach is often quicker to deploy, while Tyler’s broader enterprise scope may require more planning, training, and change management.

Related Tools