- Asset Operations Management (AOM): Unifies maintenance, operations, and reliability data into one integrated platform.
- Preventive Maintenance Automation: Automates schedules, checklists, and workflows to reduce unplanned downtime.
- Advanced Analytics & Reporting: Provides dashboards, asset downtime reports, and reliability insights for data-driven decisions.
- Mobile-First CMMS: Enables technicians to manage work orders, assets, and inventory from anywhere, even offline.
- UpKeep Intelligence (AI): Uses AI features like smart scheduling, voice fill, and automated data cleanup.
- Enterprise Integrations: Supports APIs, custom integrations, and business system connectivity.
UpKeep Enterprise Asset Management Software
Enterprise-grade asset operations management for maintenance, reliability, and operations teams
Updated May 11, 2026
UpKeep Enterprise Asset Management Software Overview
UpKeep Enterprise Asset Management Software is a cloud-based EAM and CMMS platform designed for large, asset-intensive organizations. It centralizes maintenance, operations, and reliability data into a single Asset Operations Management system.
With advanced analytics, workflow automation, mobile-first tools, and AI-powered intelligence, UpKeep helps enterprises reduce downtime, optimize resources, and improve asset lifecycle performance across multiple locations.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Essential | $20/user/mo (Billed Monthly) | Unlimited work orders, Asset management, 24/7 phone, email, and chat support |
| Premium | $55/user/mo (Billed Monthly) | Preventive maintenance optimization, Inventory management & costing, Time and manpower tracking |
| Professional | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | Advanced analytics & reporting, Mobile offline mode, Multiple inventory lines |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing (Contact Sales) | Workflow automation, Multi-site management, SSO and standard API access |
Price details: https://upkeep.com/pricing/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| MaintainX | Compared to MaintainX, UpKeep offers deeper enterprise analytics, stronger multi-site management, and more advanced asset lifecycle tracking. While MaintainX focuses on frontline simplicity, UpKeep better supports large organizations needing reliability engineering insights, complex reporting, and workflow automation without sacrificing mobile usability. |
| Fiix | UpKeep is easier to deploy and navigate than Fiix, especially for mobile technicians. It delivers comparable preventive maintenance capabilities while providing a more intuitive interface and faster onboarding, making it attractive for teams that want enterprise power without heavy configuration overhead. |
| IBM Maximo | Against IBM Maximo, UpKeep stands out for affordability, faster implementation, and a modern user experience. Maximo is highly complex and costly, while UpKeep balances enterprise-grade functionality with usability, making it more accessible for mid-to-large organizations. |
| Limble CMMS | UpKeep provides more advanced reporting, AI-driven insights, and asset operations management than Limble. While Limble excels in simplicity, UpKeep is better suited for organizations that require scalability, multi-location visibility, and deeper operational intelligence. |
| Hippo CMMS | Compared to Hippo CMMS, UpKeep delivers stronger mobile performance, more frequent feature updates, and better support for enterprise workflows. Its analytics and automation tools help organizations move beyond basic maintenance tracking toward strategic asset management. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| MaintainX | MaintainX can feel more lightweight and faster for small teams, whereas UpKeep’s broader feature set may introduce additional setup time and complexity for organizations that only need basic work order management. |
| Fiix | Fiix offers deeper native reliability engineering tools in some configurations, while UpKeep may require higher-tier plans to unlock comparable advanced analytics, which can increase overall cost. |
| IBM Maximo | Maximo surpasses UpKeep in highly regulated industries needing extreme customization and industry-specific modules, whereas UpKeep prioritizes usability over very deep, niche configuration options. |
| Limble CMMS | Limble can be more budget-friendly for smaller teams, while UpKeep’s per-user pricing and enterprise focus may be excessive for organizations with minimal assets or simple maintenance needs. |
| Hippo CMMS | Hippo’s simpler structure may appeal to non-technical users, whereas UpKeep’s advanced features and analytics can feel overwhelming without proper onboarding and training. |
Reviews
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.5/5): UpKeep delivers “excellent automation” and handles maintenance requests promptly, which creates a smooth and reliable workflow for one service coordinator. The ability to add documents and complete preliminary reports keeps operations organized, and another reviewer highlighted how inventory tracking and product updates improved efficiency. Some frustration appears around heavy customization requirements and occasional crashes tied to connectivity issues that slow down loading.
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.6/5): UpKeep helps teams create, assign, and track work orders in real time, and several users rely on it daily to record maintenance for production assets. The mobile app works well for technicians, and one reviewer credited it with reducing downtime and improving asset management. Others criticized limited customization, higher costs for advanced features, slow UI performance, and moments when the system goes down or becomes hard to navigate with too many assets listed.
