- Work Order Management: Create, assign, track, and close work orders from web or mobile devices.
- Preventive Maintenance: Automate scheduled maintenance using time, meter readings, or IoT triggers.
- Asset Management: Monitor asset health, uptime, lifecycle, and performance across locations.
- Parts & Inventory Control: Track stock levels, automate alerts, and optimize purchasing workflows.
- Analytics & Reporting: Access dashboards and reports for compliance, costs, downtime, and reliability.
- AI Intelligence Suite: Use AI tools like smart scheduling, voice fill, and automated summaries.
UpKeep
Mobile-first, AI-powered CMMS for modern maintenance and asset operations
Updated July 30, 2026
UpKeep Overview
UpKeep is a cloud-based, mobile-first CMMS designed to streamline maintenance, reliability, and asset operations. It unifies work orders, preventive maintenance, assets, inventory, analytics, and AI-powered insights in one platform.
Built for technicians and managers alike, UpKeep helps organizations reduce downtime, improve asset health, and gain real-time operational visibility across single or multi-site environments.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Essential | $24/user/mo | Unlimited work orders, unlimited locations, Nova AI |
| Premium | $55/user/mo | PM scheduling, custom checklists, parts & inventory management with costing, 30-day analytics history |
| Professional | Custom Pricing (Request a Quote) | Mobile offline mode, external request portal, full analytics history, asset lifecycle tracking |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing (Request a Quote) | Multi-site module support, workflow automation, PO management, API & custom integrations, SSO |
Pricing source: https://upkeep.com/pricing/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| MaintainX | Compared to MaintainX, UpKeep offers more advanced asset management and enterprise scalability. Its AI-powered features and deeper analytics are better suited for organizations with complex maintenance operations, while still remaining accessible to technicians through a polished mobile app. |
| Fiix | UpKeep is generally easier to deploy and use than Fiix, especially for mobile-first teams. It requires less configuration upfront and provides a cleaner interface, making it more approachable for organizations that want faster adoption without sacrificing core CMMS functionality. |
| Hippo CMMS | Against Hippo CMMS, UpKeep stands out with stronger mobile capabilities and AI-driven automation. It supports larger teams and multi-site operations more effectively, while offering more robust analytics and preventive maintenance optimization. |
| Limble CMMS | While Limble focuses on simplicity, UpKeep provides a broader feature set for growing organizations. It balances ease of use with advanced capabilities like inventory costing, downtime tracking, and enterprise integrations. |
| IBM Maximo | Compared to IBM Maximo, UpKeep is significantly more affordable and faster to implement. It avoids heavy customization requirements while still delivering modern CMMS and EAM features suitable for mid-market and enterprise users. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| MaintainX | MaintainX can feel more lightweight, but some users find UpKeep more expensive at scale. Smaller teams that only need basic work order tracking may find MaintainX more cost-effective and simpler for limited maintenance needs. |
| Fiix | Fiix offers deeper out-of-the-box reliability engineering tools. Organizations with highly technical asset reliability programs may find UpKeep’s advanced analytics less specialized without moving to higher-tier or enterprise plans. |
| Hippo CMMS | Hippo CMMS can be cheaper for small facilities, whereas UpKeep’s per-user pricing can add up. Teams with very simple maintenance workflows may not fully utilize UpKeep’s broader feature set. |
| Limble CMMS | Limble is often praised for faster onboarding and simpler workflows. In comparison, UpKeep may feel more complex initially due to its extensive configuration options and enterprise-grade capabilities. |
| IBM Maximo | While easier than Maximo, UpKeep lacks some of the extreme customization and industry-specific modules that very large enterprises rely on. Organizations needing highly regulated, bespoke asset management may still prefer Maximo. |
Reviews
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.5/5, 1,091 reviews): One reviewer says the software “basically took me by the hand and walked me through the process of being a CMMS operator,” crediting knowledgeable support across chat, phone, and email. Others report more efficient daily planning, better communication, and faster equipment repairs, with straightforward implementation and dashboards that keep getting more useful.
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.6/5, 1,330 reviews): The review summary points to an accessible, intuitive workflow and streamlined team collaboration tools, while the most repeated complaints are high cost for advanced features and frequent technical glitches.
- TrustRadius Review (Rating: 7.0/10, 38 reviews and ratings): Noticeably cooler than the review sites above; users appreciate multi-site maintenance tracking but score the product 7 out of 10 overall.
