Home » Call Center Software » VoIP Software » 3CX
3CX is a business communications platform combining VoIP calling, video conferencing, messaging, and contact center features. It is known for its flexible deployment options, including self-hosted, on‑premise, and 3CX-hosted environments.
With no per-user monthly pricing, 3CX appeals to small businesses and enterprises seeking cost control, deep PBX functionality, CRM integrations, and growing AI-powered features such as transcription and analytics.
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| 3CX License (Entry level, SC-based) | $1590/yr (Billed Annually) |
| 3CX Hosting (Hosted by 3CX) | $400/yr (Billed Annually) |
Price details: https://www.3cx.com/ordering/pricing/
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| RingCentral | Compared to RingCentral’s per-user monthly pricing, 3CX offers a flat annual license based on simultaneous calls, which can significantly reduce costs for growing teams. It provides more deployment flexibility with on‑premise or self-hosted options and avoids long-term contracts while still supporting advanced calling and integrations. |
| Zoom Phone | Unlike Zoom Phone’s primarily cloud-only model, 3CX gives businesses freedom to self-host or run on their own infrastructure. It delivers broader PBX and call center features in one platform, integrates voice, video, chat, and messaging, and can be more cost-efficient for organizations with high call volumes. |
| Cisco Webex Calling | 3CX is generally easier and faster to deploy than Cisco Webex Calling, requiring less specialized networking expertise. It offers simpler administration, lower licensing costs, and greater flexibility in SIP trunk selection, making it more accessible for small to mid-sized businesses without dedicated Cisco specialists. |
| Avaya | Compared to Avaya’s traditionally complex and expensive systems, 3CX is lighter, more modern, and significantly cheaper to operate. It supports remote work natively with mobile and web apps and avoids heavy hardware dependencies, making it easier to scale and manage across distributed teams. |
| Mitel | 3CX offers a more flexible licensing model than Mitel, with no per-user monthly fees. Its unified platform combines PBX, video, live chat, and messaging, reducing the need for add-ons. Setup and ongoing management are simpler, especially for IT teams seeking faster deployment. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| RingCentral | Unlike RingCentral’s fully managed service, 3CX often requires more hands-on administration, especially when self-hosted. Businesses without in-house IT expertise may find setup, updates, and troubleshooting more demanding, whereas RingCentral handles most infrastructure and maintenance automatically. |
| Zoom Phone | Compared to Zoom Phone’s very simple user experience, 3CX has a steeper learning curve for administrators. Its interface and configuration options can feel complex for smaller teams that only need basic calling and prefer minimal setup and straightforward cloud-based management. |
| Cisco Webex Calling | While more affordable, 3CX lacks the enterprise-grade ecosystem and deep networking integrations that Cisco provides. Very large enterprises with strict compliance, advanced analytics, or existing Cisco infrastructure may find Webex Calling better aligned with their long-term IT strategy. |
| Avaya | 3CX does not match Avaya’s long-standing reputation in highly regulated, large-scale enterprise telephony environments. Organizations requiring extremely complex legacy integrations or carrier-grade customization may find Avaya more suitable despite the higher cost and complexity. |
| Mitel | Compared to Mitel’s strong presence in traditional telephony markets, 3CX relies more on partners and self-management. Some businesses may perceive Mitel’s solutions as more mature for large on-prem deployments, while 3CX focuses on flexibility over deep legacy telephony specialization. |
