- Agentic orchestration: Build, deploy, orchestrate and govern first-party and external AI agents.
- Enterprise rules engine: Design, test and automate sophisticated business logic with visibility and auditability.
- Process automation: Connect people, systems, approvals and long-running workflows across the enterprise.
- Process intelligence: Observe operations and AI-driven outcomes to improve control and accountability.
- Visual low-code tools: Create workflows, forms, dashboards and integrations without writing every component from scratch.
Decisions
Enterprise-grade low-code platform for intelligent process automation and decisioning
Updated August 4, 2026
Decisions Overview
Decisions is an enterprise process-orchestration platform for complex workflows, business rules and governed AI. Its visual low-code tools combine an enterprise rules engine, process automation, integrations, forms, dashboards and process intelligence. The current platform is positioned for high-stakes operations in financial services, insurance, healthcare, manufacturing, education and the public sector; pricing is custom and supplied by the vendor.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Decisions platform | Custom quote | Agentic orchestration, enterprise rules, process automation, governance and integrations |
Decisions does not publish a public dollar rate; contact the vendor for deployment, usage and AI-scope pricing.
Pricing source: https://decisions.com/enterprise-pricing
Pros
| Competitor | Pros |
|---|---|
| Appian | Decisions exposes complex rules, forms and workflows in a visual environment that .NET-oriented teams can change quickly. |
| Pega | The low-code designer and open data model can reduce dependence on certified specialists for rule-heavy applications. |
| Camunda | Forms, rules, dashboards and integrations are available in one platform rather than requiring a developer-assembled stack. |
| Microsoft Power Automate | Decisions is better suited to governed, complex decision logic and auditability than lightweight task automation. |
| UiPath | Its process-and-rules focus complements or replaces bot-first RPA when work spans people, systems and long-running decisions. |
Cons
| Competitor | Cons |
|---|---|
| Appian | Organizations wanting a highly polished packaged platform and broad mobile/case patterns may prefer Appian. |
| Pega | Pega offers deeper prebuilt case-management and industry frameworks for teams seeking prescriptive templates. |
| Camunda | Developer-first teams may prefer Camunda’s open-source core and BPMN-centric control over a proprietary low-code platform. |
| Microsoft Power Automate | Power Automate is often simpler for small Microsoft 365 automations; Decisions can be more platform than a lightweight workflow needs. |
| UiPath | Desktop and attended RPA remain UiPath strengths; Decisions is not primarily a UI-robot tool. |
Reviews
- G2 Review (4.6/5 from 41 reviews): Reviewers praise visual, low-code workflow and rules building; common caveats include a learning curve and occasional latency in large or complex flows.
- Gartner Peer Insights (4.6/5): Decisions’ current customer overview reports 4.6/5 across the major enterprise review platforms.
- Decisions customer overview: The vendor cites a 4.6/5 rating across G2, Capterra and Gartner and describes use across financial services, insurance, healthcare, education, government and manufacturing.
