- Inventory Catalog Management: Organize spare parts with detailed records including location, cost, quantities, and images.
- Real-Time Spare Parts Tracking: Automatically update inventory counts based on usage, restocking, and transactions.
- Multi-Location Inventory: Track MRO inventory across multiple stockrooms and storage locations.
- Reorder Point Alerts: Set custom minimum levels and receive notifications when parts need replenishment.
- Purchasing & Vendor Management: Create purchase orders, store supplier details, and review purchasing history.
- Tool & Parts Check-In/Out: Monitor who has tools or parts to improve accountability.
- Bill of Materials (BOM): Link spare parts and tools directly to assets for faster maintenance planning.
Ftmaintenance Spare Parts Inventory Management Software
CMMS-based spare parts inventory and MRO stockroom management solution
Updated February 28, 2026
Ftmaintenance Spare Parts Inventory Management Software Overview
FTMaintenance Spare Parts Inventory Management Software is part of the FTMaintenance Select CMMS, designed to help organizations accurately track MRO inventory, reduce stockouts, and control spare parts costs. It centralizes inventory catalogs, automates usage tracking, supports purchasing workflows, and integrates tightly with work orders and assets across cloud or on‑premise deployments.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| LITE Plan | Call for Quote (Annual SaaS subscription) | Work order-focused CMMS, Core inventory tracking, Unlimited technical support |
| LITE+ Plan | Call for Quote (Annual SaaS subscription) | Standard CMMS features, Inventory catalog management, Preventive maintenance |
| Full Scale Plan | Call for Quote (Monthly SaaS subscription) | Advanced inventory tracking, Purchasing & BOMs, Enterprise maintenance reporting |
| One-Time Purchase | Call for Quote (Perpetual license) | License ownership, Cloud or on‑premise deployment, Advanced maintenance tracking |
Price details: https://ftmaintenance.com/pricing/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| UpKeep | Compared to UpKeep, FTMaintenance offers deeper spare parts and MRO inventory controls, including BOM relationships and integrated purchasing. It is better suited for organizations needing structured inventory governance and optional on‑premise deployment, whereas UpKeep focuses more on mobile-first simplicity. |
| Fiix | FTMaintenance provides more flexible deployment options than Fiix, including perpetual licensing and local hosting. Its inventory tracking is tightly coupled with maintenance workflows, making it attractive for regulated or security-conscious environments that Fiix’s cloud-only approach may not satisfy. |
| eMaint | Against eMaint, FTMaintenance stands out with predictable pricing models and license ownership options. Its spare parts features emphasize transactional accuracy and purchasing efficiency, appealing to mid-sized organizations seeking strong inventory control without complex enterprise overhead. |
| Maintenance Connection | FTMaintenance is generally easier to configure and deploy than Maintenance Connection, particularly for inventory-centric use cases. It offers robust spare parts tracking with less implementation complexity, making it suitable for teams wanting faster time-to-value. |
| Hippo CMMS | Compared to Hippo CMMS, FTMaintenance delivers more advanced inventory and purchasing functionality. Hippo is simpler and lower-cost, but FTMaintenance better supports multi-location MRO inventory, BOMs, and detailed transaction histories. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| UpKeep | Compared to UpKeep, FTMaintenance has a less modern mobile experience and may feel less intuitive for frontline technicians. Organizations prioritizing quick mobile adoption and minimal training may find UpKeep easier to roll out. |
| Fiix | Fiix offers stronger API integrations and automation capabilities than FTMaintenance. Teams looking for extensive third-party integrations or highly automated workflows may find FTMaintenance more limited by comparison. |
| eMaint | eMaint provides more advanced analytics dashboards and enterprise-level reporting. FTMaintenance’s reporting is solid but may require additional configuration or services for organizations needing highly customized KPI visualization. |
| Maintenance Connection | Maintenance Connection offers broader enterprise asset management features. FTMaintenance, while strong in inventory and CMMS fundamentals, may not scale as effectively for very large, multi-national enterprises. |
| Hippo CMMS | Hippo CMMS is generally faster to learn and cheaper upfront. FTMaintenance’s depth in inventory management can introduce a steeper learning curve for smaller teams with limited maintenance complexity. |
Reviews
- Software Advice Review (Rating: 4.3/5): One telecommunications manager praised FTMaintenance for its ability to “customize to my needs” and highlighted Ernie’s patience during setup, while another reviewer called the system “very advanced” with features that “far surpassed its rivals” but criticized the “ease of use” as “pretty much non existent” and the pricing unattractive. An automotive user who ran the CMMS for over a year valued the web-based access and responsive tech support that “is only a phone call away,” though they reported printing issues when PMs are released.
- softwarefinder.com Review: One financial services user gave FTMaintenance Select a 5.0 score and highlighted its “great flexibility, portability, a variety of pre-built reports, and the capability to query the system,” but noted that IT must allow remote access to FT Maintenance servers to avoid firewall problems. Another reviewer described the software as intuitive and easy to navigate with a simple implementation process, yet expressed frustration over limited versatility because the system does not allow selecting or modifying the fields displayed on screen, and pointed out that default reports are limited and the interface feels outdated.
