- Real-Time Transcription: Capture spoken words during meetings and turn them into text for later review.
- Speaker Identification: Label different voices in recorded and imported audio, making it easier to see who said what.
- Smart Meeting Summaries: Generate structured notes from meeting transcripts to reduce the time spent reviewing long conversations.
- Action Item Extraction: Identify tasks, assignees, and deadlines from a meeting so follow-up work is easier to track.
- 100% Local Processing: Process recordings and transcription on the user’s device, keeping meeting audio off external servers.
- Summary Templates: Create, edit, duplicate, import, and export templates that control how AI meeting summaries are structured.
- Share & Export: Export summaries and transcripts as Markdown, Word (DOCX), PDF, or plain text, or copy them to the clipboard.
- Retranscription: Re-process saved meeting audio with another transcription provider, model, or language when the original transcript needs another pass.
- Pluggable AI Note Taking: Choose local models or connect supported AI providers for summary generation, giving users control over where that processing happens.
Meetily
Local meeting transcription and notes that stay on the user's device
Updated August 28, 2026
Meetily Overview
Meetily is an AI meeting note taker that records conversations, creates transcripts, and generates summaries. Individuals and teams use it to keep a searchable record of discussions and review key points after calls.
It is aimed at people who want meeting data kept under their control. The desktop app can capture calls from Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Discord, Slack Huddles, Webex, and other conferencing software.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Billing and scope |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source Edition – Free | Free | Meetily Community is open source and includes basic transcription with local AI processing. |
| Pro | $10/user/month (Billed Annually) | Billed at $120/user per year. Includes one year of access, Pro features, future updates, and priority email support. Each license is valid for one device. |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | For teams with 10+ users. Includes volume licensing, dedicated support, and custom deployment help. |
Pro has a 14-day free trial with full Pro features and no credit card required.
Pricing source: Meetily pricing
Pros
| Competitor | Pros |
|---|---|
| LUCI | Meetily is MIT-licensed open source, letting users inspect and modify its code. LUCI keeps meeting data locally too, but it is built around a wider searchable memory that also captures screen activity. |
| Fireflies.ai | Meetily processes recordings and transcription on the user’s device. Fireflies.ai advertises dedicated cloud storage, so Meetily better fits buyers who want the core meeting record kept local. |
Cons
| Competitor | Cons |
|---|---|
| LUCI | LUCI records meetings and screen activity into one local memory that users can search in plain language. It can also connect that memory to AI agents, which helps when meeting context needs to carry into later work. |
| Fireflies.ai | Fireflies.ai can capture meetings through a bot, Chrome extension, mobile app, desktop app, dialers, or an API. It also provides customized summaries and 100+ transcription languages, giving teams more capture and language options than Meetily. |
Reviews
- Anarlog. The tester liked Meetily’s Windows support, local transcription, private storage, and ability to use local or bring-your-own AI models. At the time of testing, they found no calendar integration or speaker identification and said Linux required building from source, and noted that users must handle their own setup and troubleshooting.
- Alphr. The reviewer liked that meeting data can stay on the user’s computer and found the product offers strong value for privacy-focused users. They found it less feature-rich than other meeting assistants and said local AI performance depends on the user’s hardware.
- G2 (Rating 5/5 from 1 review). The reviewer liked the ease of use, deployment, local processing, confidentiality, and transcription quality. They also reported high subscription costs and extra charges for Pro features, inaccurate transcription on older machines, and no integration with project management tools.
