- Live Survey Slides: Add survey questions directly into presentations and collect responses in real time.
- Multiple Question Types: Use multiple-choice, open-ended, date, email collection, and pick-one or pick-many formats.
- Audience Pace Mode: Run surveys before, during, or after sessions so participants respond on their own time.
- Instant Visual Results: Display responses as live-updating charts and visual graphs during sessions.
- AI Question Generator: Generate survey questions quickly using built-in AI tools to save setup time.
- QR Code & Link Sharing: Let participants join instantly from any device without downloads.
- Segmentation Tools: Segment votes to compare groups and identify trends within responses.
- Templates Library: Start faster with ready-made survey templates for events, workshops, and product feedback.
- Data Export & Downloads: Download submissions and export findings for further analysis.
Mentimeter.com Survey Maker
Create interactive live surveys with real-time audience feedback
Updated August 11, 2026
Mentimeter.com Survey Maker Overview
Mentimeter is an interactive presentation and survey tool for meetings, workshops and classrooms. A presenter can run polls, quizzes and Q&A, while participants join from a phone or browser using a link or QR code.
Results appear as the session runs, which makes the tool useful for checking understanding or gathering opinions in the room. AI tools can help draft questions before the audience joins.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | €0 | 50 participants per month; 23 slide types; core live engagement |
| Basic | €14 per presenter/month (billed yearly, excluding tax) | Unlimited participants; import PowerPoint, Keynote or PDF; Excel/PDF export |
| Pro | €28 per presenter/month (billed yearly, excluding tax) | Advanced design; workspace collaboration; co-creation and presentation controls |
| Enterprise | Custom | SSO, SCIM, participant verification, tailored onboarding and workspace insights |
Free is a continuing €0 plan with monthly participant limits. Basic and Pro are priced per presenter per month and billed yearly, while Enterprise requires a quote.
Pricing source: Mentimeter plans
Pros
| Compared with | Why this product may fit better |
|---|---|
| SurveyMonkey | SurveyMonkey collects conventional questionnaires for later analysis; Mentimeter puts polls, word clouds and quiz results inside a live presentation. Facilitators can react in the room as the audience responds instead of waiting until the session ends. |
| Typeform | Workshops can alternate between explanation and participation when Mentimeter places questions directly inside a presenter-led experience. Typeform creates a separate conversational form, which is better suited to self-guided completion than an interactive session. |
| Google Forms | Google Forms is a static shared form; Mentimeter uses QR joining, live charts and audience controls to turn responses into an event activity. Presenters gain visible feedback during the session rather than reviewing it later. |
| Slido | Slido often attaches audience interaction to another meeting or presentation product. Mentimeter combines presentation building, polls, quizzes and surveys in one workspace, which can reduce handoffs for teams producing standalone interactive decks. |
Cons
| Compared with | Where this product may fall short |
|---|---|
| SurveyMonkey | Long questionnaires, branching and research analysis are less central than live participation. Researchers collecting detailed responses over several days may find SurveyMonkey's distribution and reporting workflow more appropriate. |
| Google Forms | Basic collection remains free in Google Forms without presenter-based annual billing or monthly participant allowances. A team running occasional internal polls should calculate whether the live visual experience warrants a paid plan. |
| Slido | Slido has stronger native meeting-platform integration for organizations centered on Webex or Microsoft Teams. Buyers comparing Slido with Mentimeter should test their actual conferencing stack instead of looking only at poll types. |
Reviews
- Capterra reviews: Capterra lists 4.4/5. Reviewers like the simple interactive presentation workflow, polls and quizzes, while the comments also help buyers identify which participant limits and export needs push a recurring presenter onto a paid plan.
- G2 reviews: G2 lists 4.7/5 from 789 reviews, the strongest large-sample signal in this set. Users repeatedly value approachable live engagement, although a high aggregate does not answer whether annual presenter billing fits teams that run only occasional events.
- Product Hunt reviews: Product Hunt lists 3/5 and contains praise for real-time polling alongside concerns about interface responsiveness. The community and sample differ from G2, so the lower score is best treated as a prompt to test live behavior rather than averaged into one synthetic rating.
