Home » Call Center Software » VoIP Software » Microsoft Teams VoIP Software
Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration platform designed for businesses, schools, and large organizations. It combines persistent chat, video meetings, voice calls, and file collaboration tightly integrated with Microsoft 365 apps like Word, Excel, and SharePoint.
Teams is especially strong in enterprise security, compliance, and administration, making it a default choice for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Teams (Free) | $0 |
| Microsoft Teams Essentials | $4.00/user/month (Annual) / $4.80/user/month (Monthly) |
| Microsoft 365 Business Basic (includes Teams) | $6.00/user/month (Annual) |
| Microsoft 365 Business Standard (includes Teams) | $12.50/user/month (Annual) |
| Microsoft Teams Premium | $10.00/user/month (Annual) |
| Microsoft Teams Enterprise (Microsoft 365 E5) | $57.00/user/month (Annual) |
Price details: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/compare-microsoft-teams-business-options
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Zoom | Compared to Zoom, Microsoft Teams offers tighter integration with Microsoft 365 apps like Outlook, Word, and SharePoint, reducing context switching. Teams provides stronger built-in collaboration features such as persistent chat, file co-authoring, and task integration, making it more cost-effective for organizations already using Microsoft’s ecosystem. |
| Google Meet | Against Google Meet, Microsoft Teams delivers more advanced collaboration and enterprise-grade features, including channel-based teamwork, richer meeting controls, and deeper security and compliance options. Teams also supports more complex workflows and app integrations, making it better suited for medium to large organizations with structured collaboration needs. |
| Slack | Compared with Slack, Microsoft Teams combines chat, video meetings, calling, and document collaboration into a single platform. This reduces the need for third-party tools and lowers overall cost. Teams’ native integration with Microsoft 365 provides superior document management and real-time co-authoring for business users. |
| Cisco Webex | Versus Cisco Webex, Microsoft Teams is generally easier to use and faster to deploy for everyday teams. It offers a more modern user experience and broader productivity features beyond meetings, including chat and file collaboration, while still delivering strong security and reliability for enterprise environments. |
| Skype | Compared to Skype, Microsoft Teams is a far more comprehensive and future-proof solution. Teams supports large-scale collaboration, scheduled meetings, file sharing, and enterprise security, while Skype is limited mainly to basic calling and chat. Teams is better suited for professional and organizational use. |
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Zoom | Compared to Zoom, Microsoft Teams can feel heavier and more complex, especially for users who only need quick video meetings. Initial setup and navigation may be less intuitive, and performance can vary on low-end devices, whereas Zoom is often praised for its simplicity and reliability. |
| Google Meet | Against Google Meet, Microsoft Teams requires more configuration and learning time. Google Meet’s lightweight, browser-first approach is often faster for ad-hoc meetings, while Teams’ deeper feature set can feel overwhelming for small teams or users who prefer minimal interfaces. |
| Slack | Compared with Slack, Microsoft Teams’ chat experience can feel less fluid and slower, particularly in large organizations. Slack is often preferred for its clean interface and fast messaging, while Teams prioritizes structured collaboration, which may reduce flexibility for informal communication. |
| Cisco Webex | Versus Cisco Webex, Microsoft Teams may lack some advanced meeting and telephony controls valued by highly regulated or call-center-heavy environments. Webex can offer more granular meeting management, whereas Teams focuses more on general productivity than specialized conferencing needs. |
| Skype | Compared to Skype, Microsoft Teams consumes more system resources and requires a Microsoft account or organizational setup. Users who only want simple voice or video calls may find Teams unnecessarily complex, whereas Skype remains easier for very basic, casual communication. |
