- Unified Communications: Combine voice, video, messaging, and presence across desktop, mobile, and browser clients.
- Cloud & Flexible Deployment: Choose Yeastar-hosted cloud or self-hosted BYOI deployment for full control.
- Integrated Contact Center: Manage inbound queues, outbound campaigns, omnichannel messaging, and real-time analytics.
- AI-Powered Tools: Voicemail transcription, call transcription, summaries, and text-to-speech assistance.
- Open Ecosystem Integrations: Native integrations with Microsoft Teams, CRMs, helpdesks, SIP trunks, and IP phones.
- Centralized Management: Provision, monitor, and manage multiple PBX instances from one unified portal.
Yeastar Cloud PBX
All-in-one cloud PBX and UCaaS platform for modern businesses
Updated May 11, 2026
Yeastar Cloud PBX Overview
Yeastar Cloud PBX is a unified communications platform combining business telephony, video meetings, messaging, and contact center tools in one cloud-based system. Designed for SMBs, enterprises, and service providers, it supports flexible deployment, extensive integrations, AI-powered features, and centralized management.
Yeastar emphasizes reliability, scalability, and openness, with strong SIP trunk compatibility and white-label options.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Plan | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Core PBX features, Unified communications, Business call management |
| Enterprise Plan | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Advanced call center tools, CRM & Microsoft integrations, Enhanced security controls |
| Ultimate Plan | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Full feature set, Remote archiving support, White-label & service provider readiness |
Price details: https://www.yeastar.com/cloud-pbx/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| 3CX | Compared to 3CX, Yeastar Cloud PBX is often considered easier to deploy and manage, especially for MSPs. It bundles more features natively without complex add-ons, reducing operational overhead and improving overall usability for non-specialist administrators. |
| RingCentral | Yeastar offers greater deployment flexibility and lower long-term cost than RingCentral. Businesses benefit from fewer per-user fees, broader SIP trunk choice, and stronger control over infrastructure while maintaining enterprise-grade UC functionality. |
| 8×8 | Against 8×8, Yeastar stands out with its open ecosystem and white-label readiness. Service providers gain more customization options and control, while businesses avoid rigid bundles and can tailor integrations to their workflows. |
| Nextiva | Yeastar is generally more cost-effective than Nextiva for feature depth, especially for call center and omnichannel messaging. It delivers comparable UC features without locking customers into high per-seat pricing models. |
| Mitel | Compared to Mitel, Yeastar provides a more modern cloud-first experience with faster setup and simpler administration. It reduces hardware dependency and offers a smoother transition for organizations moving from legacy PBX systems. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| 3CX | While Yeastar is feature-rich, some advanced users feel 3CX offers deeper community-driven customization and scripting flexibility. Yeastar’s interface prioritizes simplicity, which may limit very granular control for power users. |
| RingCentral | Compared to RingCentral’s highly polished UI and global carrier network, Yeastar can feel less refined for end users in very large multinational deployments, particularly where bundled carrier services are preferred. |
| 8×8 | 8×8 provides more built-in analytics and enterprise compliance packages out of the box. Yeastar may require additional configuration or third-party tools to match those reporting and compliance capabilities. |
| Nextiva | Nextiva emphasizes customer support and onboarding services. Yeastar, while flexible, can require more hands-on setup and VoIP knowledge, particularly for self-hosted or partner-led deployments. |
| Mitel | Mitel’s long enterprise history brings deep legacy system support. Yeastar may be less suitable for organizations heavily invested in proprietary Mitel hardware or niche enterprise telephony environments. |
Reviews
- Reddit r/3CX: One user felt Yeastar “blows 3CX away,” praising its modern UX and UI and saying the menus feel more polished and logical. Support impressed them despite a 10‑hour time difference, and they highlighted available CRM, helpdesk, PMS integrations, and open API access. Another commenter preferred it over 3CX but criticized the 512kb MMS attachment size limit, which restricted sending photos.
- TrustRadius Review: Yeastar feels “very easy and intuitive” from the end‑user perspective, with smooth call flipping between multiple devices and straightforward handling of transfers, call parking, and holding.
