Ziteboard

Lightweight real-time whiteboard for tutoring and remote collaboration

Updated March 3, 2026

Ziteboard Overview

Ziteboard is a browser-based collaborative whiteboard designed for real-time teamwork, online tutoring, and remote meetings. It offers an infinite zoomable canvas, shape recognition, sticky notes, and integrated audio/video chat.

Built to run smoothly on laptops, tablets, and mobile devices, it emphasizes simplicity and low bandwidth usage. With math-specific tools and export options, Ziteboard supports educators, designers, and distributed teams.

Key Features

  • Infinite Zoomable Canvas: Work on an expandable whiteboard space ideal for brainstorming, tutoring, and wireframing.
  • Real-Time Collaboration: Multiple users can draw and edit simultaneously with minimal latency.
  • Integrated Audio & Video Chat: Start peer-to-peer voice and video calls directly inside the whiteboard.
  • Math Tools Suite: Includes a LaTeX formula editor, interactive graph plotter, and geometry compass.
  • Shape Recognition & Line Smoothing: Automatically converts rough sketches into clean shapes and smooth lines.
  • Image & PDF Import: Drag-and-drop images and import specific PDF pages for annotation.
  • Flexible Export Options: Export boards as PNG, vector-based SVG, or formatted PDF files.
  • Cross-Platform Access: Browser-based tool optimized for desktops, tablets, and mobile devices.
  • Public & Private Boards: Control access with shareable links or restricted private sessions.

Pricing

Plan Price Key Features
Starter Free (Forever) 3 owned boards; Unlimited collaborators; PNG/SVG/PDF export
One Week Pro $5 (One-Time Payment) Unlimited boards & traffic; Audio & video chat; Private boards
Monthly Pro $9 (Billed Monthly) Unlimited boards & traffic; HQ image & full PDF import; Backup export
Annual Pro $85/year ($7.08/mo equivalent) (Billed Annually) All Pro features; Audio & video chat; Public & private boards
Team (2–5 users) $8/user/mo (1 Month) / $7/user/mo (6 Months) / $6.5/user/mo (1 Year) Pro features for each user; Discounted per-user pricing; Flexible subscription periods
Team (6–20 users) $6.5/user/mo (1 Month) / $6/user/mo (6 Months) / $5.5/user/mo (1 Year) Pro features for each user; Lower per-user cost; Team collaboration
Team (21–100 users) $5.5/user/mo (1 Month) / $5/user/mo (6 Months) / $4.5/user/mo (1 Year) Pro features for each user; Volume discounts; Scalable team access
Enterprise Contact Sales (Custom Quote) White label license; REST API & SSO; Dedicated server & custom domain

Price details: https://ziteboard.com/pricing/

Pros

Competitor

Pros

Miro Ziteboard is significantly more affordable, especially for individual tutors and small teams, with a free forever plan and low-cost Pro tiers. Its lightweight interface loads faster on older devices and low-bandwidth connections, making it more practical for education scenarios where students may not have powerful hardware.
Mural Compared to Mural’s enterprise-focused pricing, Ziteboard offers simpler onboarding and lower entry costs. It doesn’t require complex workspace configuration, which benefits solo educators and freelancers who need instant board sharing without administrative overhead.
Microsoft Whiteboard Ziteboard works fully in-browser without requiring a Microsoft ecosystem account. Its built-in audio and video chat removes the need for separate meeting software, streamlining tutoring sessions and quick team collaborations in a single interface.
Jamboard Unlike Jamboard’s limited feature set, Ziteboard provides PDF import, SVG export, and math-specific tools such as a formula editor and graph plotter. These additions make it more suitable for structured lessons and technical discussions.
Conceptboard Ziteboard’s interface is more minimal and easier to learn for first-time users. Its pricing is also more accessible for individuals, while still offering real-time collaboration, exports, and private boards without the complexity of enterprise-heavy dashboards.

Cons

Competitor

Cons

Miro Ziteboard lacks the extensive template library, integrations, and advanced project frameworks that Miro provides. Teams managing complex product roadmaps or agile workflows may find Ziteboard too minimal for structured enterprise collaboration.
Mural Mural offers deeper facilitation tools, voting systems, and workshop controls. Ziteboard’s feature set is more basic, which can limit interactive workshop management for large corporate sessions.
Microsoft Whiteboard Microsoft Whiteboard integrates seamlessly with Teams and Office 365. Ziteboard does not offer the same level of native integration with productivity suites, which may require users to rely on manual exports.
Jamboard Jamboard’s tight integration with Google Workspace simplifies classroom management for Google-centric schools. Ziteboard, while flexible, does not natively embed within Google Classroom workflows.
Conceptboard Conceptboard includes more advanced commenting, task tracking, and compliance-focused features. Ziteboard’s simplicity means fewer governance controls for organizations with strict documentation requirements.

Reviews

  • G2 Review (Rating: 4.4/5): Ziteboard makes it easy to add images and PDF files to a board, share work quickly, and export in different formats. One senior instructor called it an “Excellent Online Whiteboard Modality for Remote Educators,” praising how user-friendly it feels compared to other tools and how simple it is to get back to the center of the image without wasting time zooming. Some wanted more tools to flip between separate whiteboards and noted that features like different pen colors sit behind the premium plan.
  • Capterra Review (Rating: 5/5): The three user reviews give Ziteboard a perfect 5.0 for ease of use, features, value for money, and customer service, with a 10/10 likelihood to recommend. The overall sentiment shows strong satisfaction across the board, with no negative feedback reflected in the ratings breakdown.
  • Gartner Review (Rating: 4.5/5): One reviewer called it the “Best Whiteboard platform” for creating and collaborating on virtual boards, highlighting drawing, writing, and simulation features that recreate a traditional whiteboard feel. They liked image and file integration, pre-built templates and grids, and device compatibility. At the same time, they pointed out limited integrations, some performance lag, limited customization options, and felt the pricing could be cheaper.