FigJam Online Collaborative Whiteboard for Teams Favicon

FigJam Online Collaborative Whiteboard for Teams

Real-time collaborative whiteboard for brainstorming, diagramming, and team workshops.

Globe Linkedin Youtube Facebook Twitter
  • Overview
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Pros
  • Cons
  • Reviews

FigJam Online Collaborative Whiteboard for Teams Overview

  • Updated March 3, 2026

FigJam is Figma’s online collaborative whiteboard built for teams to brainstorm, map workflows, and run interactive workshops in real time. It combines sticky notes, diagramming tools, templates, and engagement features like voting and timers in a shared canvas.

With AI-powered summaries and seamless integration with Figma’s design ecosystem, FigJam helps cross-functional teams align ideas and move projects forward efficiently.

Key Features

  • Infinite Collaborative Canvas: Work together in real time on an endless whiteboard with live cursors and instant updates.
  • Sticky Notes & Voting: Capture ideas quickly and prioritize them using built-in voting sessions.
  • Diagramming Tools: Create flowcharts and process maps with shapes, connectors, and snapping grids.
  • Ready-Made Templates: Start faster with 300+ templates for retros, standups, journey maps, and workshops.
  • Engagement Features: Use stamps, emotes, timers, and a music player to energize remote sessions.
  • AI-Powered Assistance: Summarize sticky notes, generate templates, and auto-sort ideas with AI tools.
  • Open Sessions: Invite external participants to collaborate for 24 hours without requiring login.
  • Advanced Diagram Libraries: Access AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes shapes for technical workflows.
  • Seamless Figma Integration: Move from brainstorming in FigJam to design and prototyping in Figma.

Price

Plan

Price

Key Features
Starter Free Unlimited drafts; Basic whiteboard & brainstorming tools; 150 AI credits/day (up to 500/month)
Professional – Collab seat $3/mo (Billed Annually) Unlimited files & projects; Voting & open sessions; Advanced diagramming tools
Professional – Dev seat $12/mo (Billed Annually) Everything in Collab; Dev Mode access; Enhanced inspection & handoff
Professional – Full seat $16/mo (Billed Annually) All Figma & FigJam features; Advanced prototyping; 3,000 AI credits/month
Organization – Collab seat $5/mo (Billed Annually) Unlimited teams; Shared libraries; Centralized admin tools
Organization – Dev seat $25/mo (Billed Annually) Advanced security; Branching & merging; Org-wide libraries
Organization – Full seat $55/mo (Billed Annually) Custom templates; Advanced diagramming shapes; 3,500 AI credits/month
Enterprise – Collab seat $5/mo (Billed Annually) Enterprise security; Custom workspaces; SCIM seat management
Enterprise – Dev seat $35/mo (Billed Annually) Advanced inspection; Design system APIs; Enterprise controls
Enterprise – Full seat $90/mo (Billed Annually) Multi-brand design systems; Advanced admin; 4,250 AI credits/month

Price details: https://www.figma.com/pricing/

Pros

Competitor

Pros
Miro FigJam offers a cleaner, more intuitive interface that feels lighter for quick brainstorming sessions. Its tight integration with Figma makes it especially powerful for product and UX teams who want to move from ideation to design without switching platforms. The free Starter plan is generous for individuals compared to Miro’s board limits.
Mural Compared to Mural, FigJam is easier to adopt for cross-functional teams due to its simple UI and playful engagement tools like stamps and emotes. Pricing for smaller teams is typically more accessible, and the built-in AI summaries reduce manual effort after workshops.
Lucidspark FigJam feels more design-centric and integrates seamlessly with Figma’s ecosystem, making it ideal for teams already using Figma. The experience is smoother for collaborative UX workflows, and advanced diagramming shapes for cloud providers add value for technical planning.
Microsoft Whiteboard FigJam delivers more structured facilitation tools such as voting, timers, AI sorting, and templates tailored for agile rituals. It also supports richer diagramming and stronger cross-platform access, whereas Microsoft Whiteboard is more limited outside the Microsoft ecosystem.
Stormboard FigJam provides a more modern, visually engaging environment with smoother real-time collaboration. Its integration with design workflows and extensive template library make it more versatile for product teams, while Stormboard focuses more narrowly on structured brainstorming formats.

Cons

Competitor

Cons
Miro Miro offers a broader marketplace of third-party integrations and enterprise-ready facilitation features. For very large workshops or complex cross-department use cases, Miro’s ecosystem and app integrations can feel more mature than FigJam’s comparatively focused toolset.
Mural Mural provides stronger built-in facilitation frameworks and permissions controls tailored to enterprise workshops. Organizations needing highly structured session management and advanced access governance may find Mural better suited than FigJam’s lighter approach.
Lucidspark Lucidspark integrates deeply with Lucidchart for advanced diagramming, which can be advantageous for process-heavy teams. FigJam’s diagramming, while capable, may not match Lucid’s specialized diagram controls for highly technical documentation.
Microsoft Whiteboard Microsoft Whiteboard is included with many Microsoft 365 plans at no additional cost. For organizations already standardized on Microsoft tools, adopting FigJam may introduce extra subscription costs and require separate user management.
Stormboard Stormboard emphasizes structured reporting and export options for formal documentation. Teams that require detailed reports and compliance-friendly outputs after sessions may find FigJam’s export and reporting capabilities less comprehensive.

Verified Customer Reviews

  • Gartner Review (Rating: 4.6/5): FigJam feels easy to jump into, and inviting teammates to a board takes almost no setup, which helps sessions start quickly. Brainstorming feels natural with sticky notes, flow diagrams, doodles, and quick reactions that keep ideas moving. Some teams ran into slow performance on very large boards, weak offline support, and a confusing editor-seat pricing model. A few also disliked the UI and said search feels like “digging through a messy drawer” when trying to find an old note.
  • G2 Review (Rating: 4.6/5): FigJam makes it easy to map user flows and system architecture diagrams without slowing down early product thinking. Real-time collaboration runs smoothly, comments feel intuitive, and the sticky notes, connectors, and templates cover most needs without feeling bloated. Large, complex diagrams can get messy, and dense boards expose gaps like limited auto-alignment, weaker layering control, and fewer architecture-specific components. Performance dips on very large boards, and advanced users want deeper documentation and guidance.