- Individual Student Whiteboards: Each student gets a private board while the teacher monitors all in real time.
- Live Teacher Dashboard: View every student’s progress simultaneously for instant formative assessment.
- No Student Login Required: Students join via link, code, or QR without creating accounts.
- Focus Mode: Temporarily pause student boards to redirect attention to the teacher’s instruction.
- PDF & Image Uploads: Upload worksheets or slides as backgrounds for annotation and problem-solving.
- Math & Graphing Tools: Built-in math editor, symbols, graphs, angles, and measurement tools.
- Assignments & Grading: Create assignment sessions, collect submissions, and provide structured feedback.
- Co-Teaching Support: Invite additional teachers to collaborate and monitor sessions together.
- Session Controls & Lobby: Waiting room, room lock, and customizable session expiration up to 365 days.
- Export & Save Options: Download all student whiteboards as PDFs or ZIP files for documentation.
Whiteboard.fi
Teacher-focused real-time collaborative whiteboards for formative classroom assessment.
Updated March 3, 2026
Whiteboard.fi Overview
Whiteboard.fi is a browser-based collaborative whiteboard designed specifically for teachers and classrooms. It gives each student an individual digital whiteboard while the teacher monitors all boards in real time.
Built for formative assessment, it works on any device without installations and supports tools like math editors, PDF uploads, focus mode, and instant feedback to actively engage every learner.
Key Features
Pricing
Plan |
Price |
Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (Per Month) | 2h session expiration; 20 students per session; 1 active session |
| Lite | $3 (Per Month) | 30 students per session; Download student work as ZIP; Focus Mode |
| Pro | $7 (Per Month) | 40 active sessions; Upload PDFs; Assignments & instant feedback |
Price details: https://www.softwaresuggest.com/whiteboard-fi#pricing
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Miro | Whiteboard.fi is more classroom-focused and easier for K–12 teachers to deploy instantly. Students don’t need accounts, and teachers get a real-time overview of every individual board, which Miro doesn’t natively structure for formative assessment. It’s also significantly more affordable for single teachers. |
| Microsoft Whiteboard | Unlike Microsoft Whiteboard, Whiteboard.fi provides individual student boards with centralized teacher monitoring, making assessment clearer. It works without requiring Microsoft accounts for students, reducing setup friction and making it more practical for younger classrooms or mixed-device environments. |
| Jamboard | Compared to Jamboard, Whiteboard.fi offers stronger classroom management tools like Focus Mode, waiting lobby, and assignment grading. The ability to see all student work at once gives teachers better control and faster feedback during live sessions. |
| Zoom Whiteboard | Whiteboard.fi is purpose-built for education, not meetings. Teachers benefit from structured student separation, math tools, and PDF worksheet annotation. Pricing is also simpler and more accessible for individual educators compared to business-oriented Zoom plans. |
| Explain Everything | Whiteboard.fi is faster to launch and doesn’t require app installations. Its lightweight browser access and no-login student entry make it more convenient for quick classroom activities, especially in schools with limited device management flexibility. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Miro | Whiteboard.fi lacks the advanced collaboration templates, integrations, and enterprise-level project features found in Miro. It’s optimized for classroom assessment, so teams seeking complex brainstorming frameworks or large-scale canvas collaboration may find it limited. |
| Microsoft Whiteboard | Microsoft Whiteboard integrates deeply with the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, which Whiteboard.fi cannot fully match. Schools heavily invested in Teams and OneDrive may prefer tighter ecosystem integration over Whiteboard.fi’s standalone approach. |
| Jamboard | Jamboard’s interface is slightly simpler for basic sticky-note collaboration. Whiteboard.fi’s teacher dashboard and multiple controls can feel more structured, which may be unnecessary for informal brainstorming sessions outside classroom assessment. |
| Zoom Whiteboard | Zoom Whiteboard benefits from seamless integration within live video meetings. Whiteboard.fi requires sharing a separate session link, which can add an extra step for remote classes already running inside video conferencing platforms. |
| Explain Everything | Explain Everything provides richer multimedia recording and presentation tools. Whiteboard.fi focuses primarily on live formative assessment, so it doesn’t offer the same level of video creation or animated lesson recording features. |
Reviews
- infinitelyteaching.com Review: whiteboard.fi had a math editor the reviewer preferred, but it lagged “A LOT,” which felt frustrating on students’ low-quality laptops. Saving a board still required a premium upgrade, and teacher tools felt less convenient compared to the competitor. Student tools seemed more intuitive, and uploading a PDF warm-up from Google Slides worked smoothly, yet the overall experience pushed the reviewer to stick with another option.
- fltmag.com Review: Whiteboard Fi lets teachers see all student work at the same time and edit boards in real time before sharing, which felt easier than Pear Deck’s setup. The ability to reply with emojis and allow students to write, type, draw, or add pictures gave more flexibility, especially for those with writing difficulties. Using Whiteboard Fi alongside tools like Flippity Quiz Show gave every student a chance to answer instead of relying on one person calling out.
