- Asset Tracking: Monitor asset lifecycle, location, and performance in real time.
- Preventive Maintenance: Schedule and automate maintenance to reduce unplanned downtime.
- Work Order Management: Create, assign, and track work orders with approvals and comments.
- Inventory Management: Control spare parts, warehouse stock, and consumption trends.
- Mobile CMMS: Access maintenance tasks offline with mobile and QR code support.
- Analytics & BI Dashboards: Gain insights through customizable reports and dashboards.
Cryotos Enterprise Asset Management Software
Enterprise asset management platform for maintenance, facilities, and operational efficiency
Updated April 9, 2026
Cryotos Enterprise Asset Management Software Overview
Cryotos Enterprise Asset Management software helps organizations centralize asset tracking, maintenance, and facility operations on a single platform. It reduces downtime through preventive maintenance, automates workflows, and improves visibility with dashboards and reports.
Suitable for enterprises across manufacturing, healthcare, facilities, and utilities, Cryotos supports mobile access, integrations, and scalable user-based pricing.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | $29/user/mo (Billed Monthly) / $320/user/yr (Billed Annually) | Work request & breakdown maintenance, Customizable checklists, Workflow automation & dashboards |
| Starter | $39/user/mo (Billed Monthly) / $420/user/yr (Billed Annually) | Preventive maintenance planning, Asset management, Mobile offline support & QR scanning |
| Professional | $69/user/mo (Billed Monthly) / $720/user/yr (Billed Annually) | Inventory management, API & GPS tracking, Advanced reports with 24/7 support |
| Enterprise | Custom Pricing | ERP & SSO integration, IoT-based monitoring, Custom BI reporting and notifications |
Price details: https://www.cryotos.com/pricing
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| IBM Maximo | Cryotos is significantly more affordable and easier to deploy than IBM Maximo, making it suitable for mid-sized enterprises. Users benefit from faster onboarding, simpler configuration, and lower infrastructure overhead while still covering core EAM and CMMS requirements. |
| Fiix | Compared to Fiix, Cryotos offers broader facility and permit-to-work features in a single platform. Its WhatsApp integration and workflow customization provide more flexibility for teams operating in regions where messaging-based coordination is critical. |
| UpKeep | Cryotos delivers deeper asset and inventory management capabilities than UpKeep at similar price points. Enterprises managing complex assets appreciate the stronger reporting, ERP integrations, and multi-organization management. |
| IFS Cloud EAM | Cryotos is simpler to use and far less resource-intensive than IFS Cloud EAM. It suits organizations that need quick value without lengthy implementations or extensive consulting engagements. |
| Maintenance Connection | Compared to Maintenance Connection, Cryotos provides a more modern UI, mobile-first experience, and competitive pricing, making it easier for frontline technicians to adopt and consistently use. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| IBM Maximo | Compared to IBM Maximo, Cryotos lacks extremely advanced asset performance management and predictive analytics required by very large industrial enterprises with complex compliance needs. |
| Fiix | Fiix offers more mature integrations with certain industrial IoT ecosystems, whereas Cryotos’ IoT capabilities are mainly available in higher enterprise tiers with customization. |
| UpKeep | UpKeep provides a more polished mobile-only experience for small teams, while Cryotos’ breadth of features can feel overwhelming for organizations seeking a very lightweight CMMS. |
| IFS Cloud EAM | IFS Cloud EAM surpasses Cryotos in global enterprise scalability and industry-specific compliance, especially for aviation and defense sectors with strict regulatory demands. |
| Maintenance Connection | Maintenance Connection includes deeper legacy reporting and long-established enterprise workflows, while Cryotos is still expanding some advanced customization options. |
Reviews
- Software Advice Review (Rating: 4.3/5): Cryotos helped one maintenance team reduce human errors and miscommunication after implementation, and the addition of e-mail templates standardized their workflow communication. Several reviewers appreciated easier data management and tracking, though they pointed out that the inventory module feels “not user friendly,” report generation needs further development, and scheduling felt difficult at the beginning.
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.7/5): Many teams rely on Cryotos to manage work orders, assets, and preventive measures efficiently, and they credit it with saving time and improving maintenance visibility. Some users struggle with slow performance in Google Chrome, occasional lag, unexpected closures, and limited features such as no photo uploads, while others want more intuitive customization and stronger spare parts management templates.
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.3/5): Cryotos gives maintenance managers clear proof of how many cases their teams close and why certain jobs remain pending, which eliminated complaint-filled meetings and replaced them with real-time status checks. The customizable WORKFLOW feature lets teams define how complaints get raised and who receives notifications, though some found preventive maintenance scheduling and workflow creation less straightforward when handling many items.
- technologyevaluation.com Review: Customers highlight strong ROI and say the software streamlines maintenance processes, asset management, and inventory control while staying easy to learn. Responsive support through phone, online chat, and 24/7 access earns praise, yet some users want deeper customization, more comprehensive training videos, and better performance stability during occasional slowdowns.
- GetApp Review (Rating: 4.3/5): A maintenance planner described the system as intuitive and essential for running daily equipment and facility operations, and another user valued quick issue resolution and ongoing support for new feature development. One reviewer noted receiving an SLA notification only after a complaint moved to “Pending with reason,” which created some frustration.
