- Work Order Management: Create, assign, track, and complete work orders with photos, notes, and job history.
- Scheduling & Dispatch: Drag-and-drop calendar and real-time dispatching to optimize technician workloads.
- Estimates & Invoicing: Generate professional estimates and invoices linked directly to work orders.
- Mobile App: Field technicians can manage jobs, capture signatures, and update statuses on the go.
- Customer Management (CRM): Store customer details, service history, and communication in one place.
- Payments & Billing: Accept payments, manage recurring billing, and reduce time to get paid.
FieldPulse Work Order Software
All-in-one work order and field service management software for growing teams
Updated March 28, 2026
FieldPulse Work Order Software Overview
FieldPulse is a cloud-based work order and field service management platform designed for service businesses like HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and general contractors. It centralizes scheduling, dispatching, invoicing, estimates, payments, and customer communication.
With strong mobile apps and responsive support, FieldPulse helps teams reduce admin work, improve job tracking, and get paid faster.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Core Platform | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Work order management, Scheduling & dispatch, Invoicing & estimates |
| Growth / Pro Tier | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Recurring billing, Advanced reporting, Team management tools |
| Enterprise | Custom Quote (Contact Sales) | Custom workflows, Priority support, Scalable user management |
Price details: https://www.fieldpulse.com/pricing
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Jobber | Compared to Jobber, FieldPulse offers deeper work order linking between jobs, estimates, and invoices, which reduces duplicate data entry. Many users find FieldPulse’s customer support more responsive and personal, while pricing tends to scale more flexibly for small teams that want advanced features without jumping to enterprise-level costs. |
| ServiceTitan | FieldPulse is significantly easier to implement and use than ServiceTitan, making it more suitable for small to mid-sized businesses. It delivers core field service functionality without the steep learning curve or high costs, allowing teams to get value quickly without dedicating resources to extensive onboarding. |
| Housecall Pro | While Housecall Pro is strong in marketing add-ons, FieldPulse excels in operational depth for work orders and internal workflows. Users often prefer FieldPulse’s customization options and job-level detail, especially for businesses managing complex or recurring service work. |
| ServiceM8 | Compared to ServiceM8, FieldPulse offers a more robust feature set for growing teams, including advanced reporting and billing workflows. It suits companies that have outgrown lightweight tools and need better visibility into jobs, finances, and technician performance. |
| Kickserv | FieldPulse generally provides a more modern interface and smoother mobile experience than Kickserv. Users often cite better scheduling tools and stronger customer support, making FieldPulse a better fit for teams that rely heavily on real-time job updates in the field. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Jobber | Compared to Jobber, FieldPulse can feel more complex for very small businesses or solo operators. Some users note that Jobber’s simplicity makes it faster to learn, while FieldPulse’s richer feature set may require more setup time before teams feel fully comfortable. |
| ServiceTitan | Against ServiceTitan, FieldPulse lacks some enterprise-level analytics and industry-specific modules. Large companies with complex reporting, multi-branch operations, or deep accounting integrations may find FieldPulse less comprehensive for their long-term scaling needs. |
| Housecall Pro | Housecall Pro offers stronger built-in marketing and customer-facing automation. FieldPulse users sometimes mention that they need third-party tools for advanced email or marketing campaigns, which Housecall Pro includes more natively. |
| ServiceM8 | ServiceM8 can be more affordable and simpler for very small teams. FieldPulse’s pricing model, which requires contacting sales, may feel less transparent and potentially higher for businesses that only need basic scheduling and invoicing features. |
| Kickserv | Kickserv provides straightforward pricing tiers, while FieldPulse requires a custom quote. Some buyers may prefer Kickserv’s upfront pricing clarity, especially during early-stage budgeting and comparison with other field service tools. |
Reviews
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.6/5): Fieldpulse Work Order Software makes it easy to enter customer information, schedule appointments, and quickly look up previous invoices and work orders. The ability to review detailed customer history in one place helps teams stay organized and efficient.
- Software Advice Review (Rating: 4.6/5): Comprehensive job management and easy invoicing deliver strong value compared to other field management systems. The scheduling assist feature adds convenience, and several users feel the platform offers better overall value than competing tools they previously used.
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.7/5): Responsive customer service and a dedicated implementation team leave a strong impression. Scheduling and CRM features work well alongside integrations, which helps teams manage operations without friction.
- GetApp Review (Rating: 4.6/5): Fieldpulse Work Order Software delivers solid value for money, especially for small businesses moving from more expensive systems. Owners praise the intuitive scheduling features and easy access to service history and customer equipment. QuickBooks Online integration streamlines syncing invoices and payments for some, while others report issues with auto-assigning customers to employees in QuickBooks and quotes getting overridden.
