- Configurable Work Orders: Create, assign, and track single or multi-asset work orders with custom fields, procedures, and approval workflows.
- Preventive & Condition-Based Maintenance: Automate recurring PMs and trigger work orders using meter readings or asset condition data.
- Drag-and-Drop Scheduler: Plan maintenance visually with conflict alerts and resource-based scheduling.
- Mobile & Offline CMMS: Complete work orders, scan barcodes, attach photos, and sync data without network connectivity.
- Advanced Reporting & Analytics: Monitor KPIs like MTBF, downtime, labor costs, and PM compliance with dashboards and exports.
- Enterprise Integrations: Connect with ERP, BI, SCADA, and 1000+ applications through APIs and integration hubs.
eMaint Work Order Management Software
Enterprise-grade CMMS for streamlined, automated, and mobile work order management
Updated April 9, 2026
eMaint Work Order Management Software Overview
eMaint Work Order Management Software is a powerful CMMS by Fluke Reliability designed to help maintenance teams plan, track, and automate work orders at scale.
It supports preventive and condition-based maintenance, mobile and offline work, advanced workflows, and deep integrations. eMaint is widely used across manufacturing, facilities, energy, and regulated industries to improve uptime and maintenance reliability.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Featured |
|---|---|---|
| Team (3 Users) | $69/user/month (Billed Monthly or Annually) | Unlimited work orders, preventive maintenance scheduling, standard reports & dashboards |
| Professional (3+ Users) | $85/user/month (Billed Monthly or Annually) | Advanced workflows, condition-based maintenance, offline mobile app |
| Enterprise (3+ Users) | Custom Quote | Global multi-site management, API & ERP integrations, single sign-on (SSO) |
Price details: https://www.emaint.com/cmms-pricing/
Pros
Competitor |
Pros |
|---|---|
| Fiix CMMS | Compared to Fiix, eMaint offers deeper configurability and stronger enterprise controls, especially for complex workflows and regulated environments. While Fiix is simpler to deploy, eMaint provides more robust reporting, asset hierarchies, and condition-based automation, making it better suited for large maintenance teams that require flexibility and long-term scalability. |
| UpKeep | eMaint outperforms UpKeep in advanced maintenance planning and multi-site management. While UpKeep emphasizes ease of use for small teams, eMaint excels in automation, approval workflows, and integration depth, which benefits organizations managing thousands of assets across plants or regions. |
| Limble CMMS | Against Limble, eMaint provides more enterprise-grade features such as condition monitoring, API integrations, and advanced security controls. Limble is often faster to learn, but eMaint supports more complex maintenance strategies and reporting needs, particularly in manufacturing and energy sectors. |
| Hippo CMMS | eMaint delivers far greater customization and automation than Hippo CMMS. Hippo works well for facilities-focused teams, but eMaint supports broader industrial use cases with detailed asset data, predictive maintenance options, and stronger analytics for reliability-driven organizations. |
| Maintenance Connection | Compared to Maintenance Connection, eMaint benefits from a more modern interface and tighter integration with Fluke Reliability tools. Both are enterprise-focused, but eMaint is often preferred for its mobile experience, configurability, and continuous feature updates included in subscriptions. |
Cons
Competitor |
Cons |
|---|---|
| Fiix CMMS | Compared to Fiix, eMaint can feel more complex and requires longer onboarding. Teams looking for a lightweight CMMS may find Fiix faster to implement, while eMaint’s flexibility may introduce configuration overhead and a steeper learning curve for new or non-technical users. |
| UpKeep | UpKeep is generally more intuitive for frontline technicians, whereas eMaint’s interface can feel dense. Smaller teams may view eMaint as excessive in both functionality and cost compared to UpKeep’s simpler pricing and faster day-to-day usability. |
| Limble CMMS | Limble often provides quicker setup and clearer pricing. In contrast, eMaint’s pricing structure and reliance on sales-assisted quotes can slow buying decisions, especially for organizations that want immediate transparency and minimal configuration. |
| Hippo CMMS | Hippo offers a more straightforward experience for facility maintenance teams. eMaint may be overwhelming for organizations that do not need advanced automation, condition monitoring, or enterprise integrations, leading to underutilized features. |
| Maintenance Connection | While comparable in scope, Maintenance Connection may offer more prescriptive enterprise templates out of the box. eMaint’s strength in configurability can also be a drawback, as it often requires more internal ownership and setup effort to reach optimal performance. |
Reviews
- Software Advice Review (Rating: 4.4/5): The flexible reporting tools let teams create custom reports that focus on specific inventory, assets, or work orders. One maintenance team reduced downtime after they used Emaint Work Order Management Software to view scheduled work orders, equipment history, and technician time in one place, which helped them decide when to repair or replace equipment instead of guessing.
- Capterra Review (Rating: 4.4/5): A global maintenance manager rolled out the system to 35 sites and praised its automatic translation, shared databases, and standardized task procedures across countries. The ability to treat every view as a report that teams can modify and share between sites stood out, though former SAP PM users missed the Asset Tree search functionality.
- coastapp.com Review: The platform delivers an extensive feature set and proactive support, and the configurable left sidebar lets users add, remove, and sort menu items to match their workflow. The review criticizes the lack of built-in chat and the gated free trial process that requires scheduling a demo by email, and it notes that pricing feels expensive for small businesses.
- G2 Review (Rating: 4.5/5): Emaint Work Order Management Software helps teams manage work orders and assets in one place, which saves time and improves efficiency. Quick setup and a reliable support team make it easier for organizations to get up and running without long delays.
- Reddit r/maintenance: One maintenance professional found it incredibly easy to use and said technicians picked it up quickly after implementation. The same user struggled with a missing calculation for PM completion reports and had to finish the numbers in Excel each month, and another commenter noted a steeper learning curve and some mobile app quirks compared to simpler alternatives.
