- Job advertising: Publish openings to a branded career site, employee referral portal and job boards.
- Candidate pipeline: Move applicants through shared stages with questionnaires and automated actions.
- Interviews and feedback: Schedule interviews, use guides or scorecards and collect hiring-team feedback.
- Offers and handoff: Manage approvals, e-signatures, background checks and transfer new hires to an HR system.
- Product boundary: Breezy Perform handles review cycles, goals, feedback and one-on-ones as a separate product.
Breezy HR
Applicant tracking for job advertising, candidate screening, interviews, and offers.
Updated August 11, 2026
Breezy HR Overview
Breezy HR is an applicant tracking system for growing companies hiring their own employees. Teams can publish jobs and career pages, collect applicants in a shared pipeline, screen candidates, schedule interviews and gather scorecard feedback in one place.
After a decision, Breezy supports offer approvals, e-signatures, background-check integrations and moving a new hire into an HR system. Reporting covers candidate sources and hiring activity. Breezy Perform is a separate product, so reviews, goals and one-on-ones are not core ATS features.
Key Features
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Billing and scope |
|---|---|---|
| Bootstrap | Free | Free plan |
| Startup | $189/month (Billed Monthly) $157/month (Billed Annually) |
USD |
| Growth | $329/month (Billed Monthly) $273/month (Billed Annually) |
USD |
| Business | $529/month (Billed Monthly) $439/month (Billed Annually) |
USD |
| Custom Pro | Contact sales | Custom pricing |
Breezy HR has a 14-day free trial. Bootstrap is a persistent free plan.
Optional add-ons and fees: Breezy Intelligence at $30 per 100,000 credits, SMS/Text starting at $41/month, and Onboard starting at $49/month. Perform and expert training are priced separately.
Pricing source: Breezy HR pricing
Pros
| Competitor | Where this tool may fit better |
|---|---|
| JazzHR | Breezy combines a visual candidate pipeline with a limited free Bootstrap tier. That gives a team comparing JazzHR a practical way to test one opening. A small hiring team can try a real opening before committing. The people doing the hiring can judge usability for themselves instead of relying on a feature list. |
| Greenhouse | Alongside Greenhouse, Breezy can be lighter to introduce for a smaller recruiting operation that wants shared pipelines, interviews and candidate communication. It avoids making an enterprise hiring process the starting point for every customer. |
| Lever | Lever puts more weight on candidate relationship management. Breezy stays focused on core ATS collaboration and a visual hiring process. Teams that do not need a large candidate-relationship program may find that scope easier to train and administer. |
| Workable | Unlike Workable, Breezy gives cautious buyers a free entry point and a straightforward pipeline to test with their own vacancies. That can be attractive when the first goal is to replace spreadsheets, not build a broad sourcing stack. |
Cons
| Competitor | Where the rival may have the edge |
|---|---|
| JazzHR | Breezy’s Bootstrap plan allows one active job or pool and access to candidates added within the last 30 days. Teams comparing JazzHR should price the first paid Breezy tier they actually need instead of treating Bootstrap as a complete ATS. |
| Greenhouse | Greenhouse should stay on the shortlist when a large recruiting team needs stricter interview processes, oversight and reporting across many hiring groups. Breezy is designed as a lighter starting point. |
| Lever | Lever is the stronger comparison when long-term candidate nurturing and recruiting CRM work drive the purchase. Breezy’s simpler ATS focus can leave more relationship management to separate processes. |
| Workable | Workable deserves a close look when the team expects the ATS to help find candidates as well as manage applicants. Breezy’s sourcing, automation and integration depth still varies by plan. |
Reviews
- G2 Breezy HR reviews: A February 2026 HR manager praises easy interview scheduling and automated pipeline actions but wants job locations shown in email notifications. Another visible reviewer says setup took about an hour and job-board workflows were easy, while managing separate agency clients required manual customization.
